Bombay High Court: ‘GIRNAR’ a Well Known Trademark in India  ||  Kerala HC: Criminal Courts of District Judiciary Cannot Recall their Earlier Orders  ||  Madras HC: Only ‘Preponderance of Probability’ Required in Disciplinary Proceedings  ||  Raj HC: Non-Disclosure of Information Wasn’t a Ground for Disqualification Before 2015 Amendment Act  ||  Bom. HC: Workers in Statutory Canteens are Principal Employer’s Employees  ||  Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions  ||  Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions  ||  SC Refuses to Mark Presence of Advocate Who Did Not Argue the Matter  ||  SC Sets Aside HC’s Decision to Accept Aadhaar Card as a Proof of Date of Birth  ||  SC Permits Candidate with Blindness to Attend Interview for Selection of Civil Judges in Rajasthan    

SC: Can’t Prove Discovery Against Person Who Wasn’t in Custody at Time of Confession - (26 Sep 2023)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that being in custody and being accused of an offense are indispensable pre-requisites to render a confession made to police admissible to a limited extent, and therefore discovery can’t be proved against any person if these conditions are not complied with.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   DISCOVERY   CONFESSION   PROVE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved