J&K&L HC: Matrimonial Remedies May Overlap, But Cruelty Claims Cannot be Selectively Invoked  ||  Delhi High Court: Customs Officials Acting Officially Cannot be Cross-Examined as of Right  ||  J&K&L HC: Second Arbitral Reference is Maintainable if Award is Set Aside Without Deciding Merits  ||  J&K&L HC: Gold Voluntarily Given to Customer is 'Entrustment'; Theft Excluded from Insurance Cover  ||  Delhi HC: Working Mothers Cannot be Forced to Bear Full Childcare Burden While Fathers Evade Duty  ||  J&K&L HC: Arbitral Tribunal Not a “Court”; Giving False Evidence Before it Doesn’t Attract S.195 CrPC  ||  Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory    

DCIT vs. SRS Real Estate Ltd. - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (21 Sep 2023)

Addition under Section 153A of IT Act, in case of unabated assessment can only be made on the basis of incriminating material found during search

MANU/ID/1343/2023

Direct Taxation

In present case, a search action under Section 132(1)(A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) was carried out in the case of the assessee. Subsequently, assessment proceedings were initiated and order under Section 153(1)(b) read with Section 143 (3) of the Act was passed making addition of Rs.1,87,00,000 on account of unexplained credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Upon assessee's appeal, learned CIT (A), upon a finding that no incriminating documents/records or any other evidence was found or seized during the course of search, deleted the addition referring to Hon'ble Delhi High Court decision in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla.

There is a clear finding by the learned CIT (A) that there is no incriminating material found during the course of search on the basis of which addition was made.

It is now judicially settled that, addition under Section 153A of IT Act, in case of unabated assessment can only be made on the basis of incriminating material found during search. Since, in the present case, there is no dispute that addition has not been made on incriminating material found during search. The addition is not legally sustainable. Hence, in view of precedents, present Tribunal confirm the order of learned CIT (A). The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

Tags : ASSESSMENT   DELETION   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved