Delhi HC: Maintenance is Intended to Safeguard Dependent Spouse & Child’s Right to Live With Dignity  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has the Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad  ||  Bombay HC: Can’t Quash Rape Cases on the Basis of Compromise  ||  Madras HC: Can’t Tap Individual’s Phone to Uncover Suspected Crime  ||  Karnataka HC: Women Commuters Oppose Ban on Bike Taxis in Karnataka  ||  Delhi HC: Inclusive Education is About Recognising That Every Child Has a Place in Classroom  ||  Delhi HC: Patanjali to Not Run Ads that are Disparaging to Dabur Products  ||  Delhi HC Upholds Rule Restricting Retention of GPRA by Central Armed Police Forces  ||  Delhi HC: Disability Pension Ensures that a Soldier is Not Left Without Support  ||  SC Declines Petition by Lalit Modi against BCCI Seeking Indemnification    

DCIT vs. SRS Real Estate Ltd. - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (21 Sep 2023)

Addition under Section 153A of IT Act, in case of unabated assessment can only be made on the basis of incriminating material found during search

MANU/ID/1343/2023

Direct Taxation

In present case, a search action under Section 132(1)(A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) was carried out in the case of the assessee. Subsequently, assessment proceedings were initiated and order under Section 153(1)(b) read with Section 143 (3) of the Act was passed making addition of Rs.1,87,00,000 on account of unexplained credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Upon assessee's appeal, learned CIT (A), upon a finding that no incriminating documents/records or any other evidence was found or seized during the course of search, deleted the addition referring to Hon'ble Delhi High Court decision in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla.

There is a clear finding by the learned CIT (A) that there is no incriminating material found during the course of search on the basis of which addition was made.

It is now judicially settled that, addition under Section 153A of IT Act, in case of unabated assessment can only be made on the basis of incriminating material found during search. Since, in the present case, there is no dispute that addition has not been made on incriminating material found during search. The addition is not legally sustainable. Hence, in view of precedents, present Tribunal confirm the order of learned CIT (A). The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

Tags : ASSESSMENT   DELETION   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved