Madras HC: Repeated Remand Orders U/S 37 A&C Act are Unworkable Without Reversing Merits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unproven Immoral Conduct of a Parent Cannot Influence Child Custody Decisions  ||  Delhi High Court: Counsel Cannot Treat Passovers or Adjournments as an Automatic Right  ||  Delhi HC: Landlord’s Rent Control Act Rights Cannot be Waived by Contract With Tenant  ||  Bom HC: Arbitrator Who Halts Proceedings over Unpaid Revised Fees Effectively Withdraws From Office  ||  SC Holds That if Some Offences Are Quashed On Compromise, The FIR Cannot Continue For Others  ||  SC Holds That Prior Opportunity to See Accused Can Render Test Identification Proceeding Unreliable  ||  Allahabad HC: Employees of Constituent Institutions are not Entitled to Central University Benefits  ||  Calcutta High Court: Juvenile Accused Eligible to Apply for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC  ||  J&K & L HC: Departmental Proceedings Not Halted by Pending Criminal Case Without Showing Prejudice    

Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India & Ors. - (Supreme Court) (13 May 2016)

Criminal defamation provisions to stay

Criminal

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 199 CrPC, provisions that deal with matters of defamation.

In a rare display of bipartisanship, the upper echelon of political parties BJP, AAP and Congress had sought striking down of the provisions for being unreasonable, stultifying constitutional freedom of expression and ultimately bringing-in arbitrariness.

The court reiterated that the law of the land should not be abused to settle vendetta or personal vengeance. However, rather than repeal the law, it called for greater scrutiny at the time of taking cognisance of such matters.

Criminal proceedings for defamation are misused frequently, and on an industrial scale, for the relatively lower barriers of entry into the criminal justice system. Used in political contexts, the laws have received much public attention in recent times for their use to intimidate and as political bargaining tools.

Relevant : Pepsi Foods Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others MANU/SC/1090/1998 N. Ravi and Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/1314/2004 In Re: The Special Courts Bill, 1978 MANU/SC/0039/1978 Section 499 IPC Act

Tags : CRIMINAL DEFAMATION   CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY   MISUSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved