SC: Hindu Daughter-In-Law Widowed After Her Father-In-Law’s Death is Entitled to Maintenance  ||  SC: Vendor Remains a Necessary Party in Specific Performance Suits Even After Transferring Property  ||  Raj HC: Having Different Age Criteria For Contractual and Regular Appointments is Unconstitutional  ||  Delhi HC: Registered Property Title Prevails over Claims Based on Oral Family Settlements  ||  Gauhati HC: Only A Family Court Can Grant A Divorce under Muslim Law, Not A Civil Judge  ||  Del HC: Courts Cannot Compel Lawyers to Disclose Sources of Documents Filed on Clients' Instructions  ||  SC Explains When Shares Received After Company Amalgamation are Taxable as Business Income  ||  SC: Excavators, Dumpers Etc Used Within Factories aren’t Motor Vehicles For Road Tax Purposes  ||  SC: Complaints Alleging Fraud under Companies Act Can Be Filed Only By SFIO, Not By Private Parties  ||  SC: Preventive Detention Cannot Override Bail and Requires Proof of a Threat to Public Order    

Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India & Ors. - (Supreme Court) (13 May 2016)

Criminal defamation provisions to stay

Criminal

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 199 CrPC, provisions that deal with matters of defamation.

In a rare display of bipartisanship, the upper echelon of political parties BJP, AAP and Congress had sought striking down of the provisions for being unreasonable, stultifying constitutional freedom of expression and ultimately bringing-in arbitrariness.

The court reiterated that the law of the land should not be abused to settle vendetta or personal vengeance. However, rather than repeal the law, it called for greater scrutiny at the time of taking cognisance of such matters.

Criminal proceedings for defamation are misused frequently, and on an industrial scale, for the relatively lower barriers of entry into the criminal justice system. Used in political contexts, the laws have received much public attention in recent times for their use to intimidate and as political bargaining tools.

Relevant : Pepsi Foods Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others MANU/SC/1090/1998 N. Ravi and Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/1314/2004 In Re: The Special Courts Bill, 1978 MANU/SC/0039/1978 Section 499 IPC Act

Tags : CRIMINAL DEFAMATION   CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY   MISUSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved