Delhi HC: Non-Proof of Hearing Notice Dispatch Doesn’t by Itself Show no Personal Hearing Was Given  ||  Delhi High Court: No Construction or Residence Allowed on Yamuna Floodplains, Even For Graveyards  ||  J&K High Court: Right to Speedy Trial Includes Appeals; Closes 46-Year-Old Criminal Case Due to Delay  ||  J&K High Court: Courts Must Not Halt Corruption Probes, Refuses to Quash FIR  ||  J&K&L HC: Matrimonial Remedies May Overlap, But Cruelty Claims Cannot be Selectively Invoked  ||  Delhi High Court: Customs Officials Acting Officially Cannot be Cross-Examined as of Right  ||  J&K&L HC: Second Arbitral Reference is Maintainable if Award is Set Aside Without Deciding Merits  ||  J&K&L HC: Gold Voluntarily Given to Customer is 'Entrustment'; Theft Excluded from Insurance Cover  ||  Delhi HC: Working Mothers Cannot be Forced to Bear Full Childcare Burden While Fathers Evade Duty  ||  J&K&L HC: Arbitral Tribunal Not a “Court”; Giving False Evidence Before it Doesn’t Attract S.195 CrPC    

Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India & Ors. - (Supreme Court) (13 May 2016)

Criminal defamation provisions to stay

Criminal

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 199 CrPC, provisions that deal with matters of defamation.

In a rare display of bipartisanship, the upper echelon of political parties BJP, AAP and Congress had sought striking down of the provisions for being unreasonable, stultifying constitutional freedom of expression and ultimately bringing-in arbitrariness.

The court reiterated that the law of the land should not be abused to settle vendetta or personal vengeance. However, rather than repeal the law, it called for greater scrutiny at the time of taking cognisance of such matters.

Criminal proceedings for defamation are misused frequently, and on an industrial scale, for the relatively lower barriers of entry into the criminal justice system. Used in political contexts, the laws have received much public attention in recent times for their use to intimidate and as political bargaining tools.

Relevant : Pepsi Foods Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others MANU/SC/1090/1998 N. Ravi and Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/1314/2004 In Re: The Special Courts Bill, 1978 MANU/SC/0039/1978 Section 499 IPC Act

Tags : CRIMINAL DEFAMATION   CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY   MISUSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved