Supreme Court Awards Rs. 6 Lakh to Man Acquitted After 6 Years, Faults UP Police Probe  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Can Restore Power on 50% Deposit in Arbitrary Theft Assessments  ||  Supreme Court: Cooperative Society Cannot Deny RTI Records as Personal if Registrar Can Access Them  ||  SC: CoC Cannot Withdraw Approved Resolution Plan Over Improved Corporate Debtor Finances  ||  Delhi High Court: 24-Week Limit Alone Cannot Restrict Medical Termination of Pregnancy  ||  Allahabad High Court Rejects Challenge to 18% GST on Online Legal Database Services  ||  Madras High Court: FIR Registration Does Not Decide Guilt; Prior Hearing of Accused Not Required  ||  Kerala High Court Orders Speedy Prosecution Sanction Process in Sabarimala Gold Theft Case  ||  Allahabad HC: Missing RT-PCR Report Cannot Bar COVID-19 Compensation if Records Confirm Infection  ||  MP High Court Directs Indore Police to Deploy Volunteers for Reporting Noise Pollution Violations    

Sampark Livelihoods Promotion Trust vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (08 Aug 2023)

For the activities outside India, it is mandatory to obtain necessary approval as per Section 11(1)(c) of the IT Act

MANU/IL/0243/2023

Direct Taxation

The assessee is a trust registered under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882. The assessee filed application in Form 10A along with documents for obtaining registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act). A provisional registration was granted. Thereafter the assessee filed application in Form 10AB for registration under Section 12AB of the Act. The CIT(Exemptions) [CIT(E)]issued notice and the assessee filed certain details. On verification, it was noticed that the assessee carried out the activities outside India and expended funds on the projects.

The assessee was provided opportunity to provide a copy of the Special Order of the Board for conducting activities outside India. The CIT(E) observed, however, in order to carry out activities outside India, permission is required from the Board as per Section 11(1)(c) of the IT Act. Since the assessee failed to produce the permission from the Board and other documents regarding genuineness of the activities of the trust and compliance in terms of Section 12AB(1)(b)(i & ii) of the Act, the application for registration under Section 12AB was rejected by the CIT(E). Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

The assessee has been granted provisional registration and the assessee filed application in Form 10AB for regular registration which has been rejected by the CIT(E) stating that, the assessee has not followed the provisions of Section 11(1)(c) and not complied with the requirements of the provisions of the Act as well as failed to prove the genuineness of the activities of the trust. For the activities outside India, it is mandatory to obtain necessary approval as per Section 11(1)(c) of the Act which has not been complied by the assessee.

Permission from the Board is mandatory as per Section 11(1)(c) of IT Act for the above international projects/activities. It is also not clear whether the MAVIM (2017-2018) project is national or international project. The order of the learned CIT(E) is confirmed. The appeal by the assessee is dismissed.

Tags : TRUST   REGISTRATION   GRANT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved