Supreme Court: Air Force Group Insurance Society qualifies as ‘State’ under Article 12  ||  SC: Anganwadi Workers With Degrees Are Eligible For The 29% Quota For Supervisors in Kerala  ||  SC: Giving Accused the Option of Search Before a Police Officer Breaches Section 50 of the NDPS Act  ||  Gujarat HC: Person is Entitled to Compensation For Injury or Death Within Railway Station Premises  ||  Delhi HC: PMLA Can Apply Even if the Scheduled Offence Occurred Before the Law Came Into Force  ||  J&K&L HC: Accused Can Admit Evidence Recorded under Section 299 Crpc After Appearing in Court  ||  J&K&L HC: District Judge Serving as Reference Court under Land Acquisition Act Acts as a Civil Court  ||  Del HC: Subsequent Bail Pleas From Same FIR Should Usually Go Before the Judge Who Denied the First  ||  J&K&L HC: Vaishno Devi Shrine Board, Despite Statutory Status, is Not a ‘State’ under Article 12  ||  SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation    

Shri Vinodchandra Dalsukhram Gokhlani vs.Income Tax Officer - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (04 Aug 2023)

When there is no doubt on papers and the conduct of the parties, creating doubt cannot be the basis for making addition

MANU/IB/0370/2023

Direct Taxation

The return of income was field on 30.09.2014 declaring total income of Rs.7,52,410 and agricultural income of Rs.6,16,315. The same was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer observed that in this case information was received from Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) and as per the documents found, the assessee was in receipt of on-money on sale of two shops at Radhanpur. Therefore, show cause notice was issued. The Assessing Officer made addition of Rs.21,58,000 as unaccounted sale proceeds. Being aggrieved by the Assessment Order, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee.

The entire revenue's base on addition is of the loose papers found in the diary as well as statements of the partners but the said statement was retracted. In fact, it was not retracted but the statement given at the time of survey did not reveal that there was on-money transaction in respect of sale of shop. From the affidavit of the partners as well as from the registered document of sale deed, it clearly indicates that the purchase price of the shop was Rs.2.21,000 only.

Creating doubt, when there is no doubt on papers as well as to that of the conduct of the parties cannot be the basis for making addition. Thus, the Assessing Officer as well as the CIT(A) was not right in making addition in respect of unaccounted sale proceeds. Appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Tags : ASSESSMENT   ADDITIONS   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved