Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

Gram Vikas Parivar Kaiyal vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (28 Jul 2023)

Section 12AB of the IT Act casts mandatory duty upon Principal Commissioner to conduct enquiry about the activities of Trust in order to grant registration

MANU/IB/0363/2023

Direct Taxation

Application under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was filed by the different assessees in Form No.10AB under Rule 17A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Rejection of application in Form 10AB under Section 12AB of the Act on the ground of non-satisfaction of genuineness of the activities of the trust is under challenge before us by different assessees.

Under Section 12AB of the Act, it is the mandatory duty cast upon the CIT(E)/Principal Commissioner to conduct an enquiry about the activities of the Trust and to verify the objects as per the Trust deed and the genuineness of the activities of the Trust upon receipt of the relevant documents furnished by the assessee alongwith application for grant of registration of the Trust. Further that, the Commissioner is required to be satisfied himself about the genuineness of the activities of the trust and also to verify that these activities are in consonance with the objects of the Trust or Institution. Despite various opportunities as per the statutory provision, the assessee failed to submit the complete set of details and therefore, satisfaction in regard to the genuineness of the activities or verification of its activities whether the same is in consonance with its objects was unable to be arrived at by the Learned CIT(E) and the application for grant of the registration of the Trust under Section 12AB of the Act stood rejected.

In order to prevent the miscarriage of justice, present Tribunal find it fit and proper to provide another opportunity of being heard to the assessee in support of his case for registration of the Trust under Section 12AB of the Act. Appeal restored to the file of the Learned CIT(E) with a direction upon him to provide a further opportunity of being heard to the assessee and to consider the documents and/or evidence which the assessee would file as per the direction issued by the CIT(E). Appeal of assessee allowed.

Tags : REGISTRATION   GRANT   OPPORTUNITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved