Delhi HC: MYAS Not Bound to ‘Rubber-Stamp’ International Federation Choices  ||  AP HC: Fulfilling Rehabilitation Promises to Displaced is State’s Constitutional Obligation  ||  SC: Career Progression to Higher Echelons of Judiciary is Neither a Matter of Right Nor Entitlement  ||  Provisions of Tribunal Reforms Act 2022 Struck Down as Unconstitutional  ||  Madras HC: Repeated Remand Orders U/S 37 A&C Act are Unworkable Without Reversing Merits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unproven Immoral Conduct of a Parent Cannot Influence Child Custody Decisions  ||  Delhi High Court: Counsel Cannot Treat Passovers or Adjournments as an Automatic Right  ||  Delhi HC: Landlord’s Rent Control Act Rights Cannot be Waived by Contract With Tenant  ||  Bom HC: Arbitrator Who Halts Proceedings over Unpaid Revised Fees Effectively Withdraws From Office  ||  SC Holds That if Some Offences Are Quashed On Compromise, The FIR Cannot Continue For Others    

Gram Vikas Parivar Kaiyal vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (28 Jul 2023)

Section 12AB of the IT Act casts mandatory duty upon Principal Commissioner to conduct enquiry about the activities of Trust in order to grant registration

MANU/IB/0363/2023

Direct Taxation

Application under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was filed by the different assessees in Form No.10AB under Rule 17A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Rejection of application in Form 10AB under Section 12AB of the Act on the ground of non-satisfaction of genuineness of the activities of the trust is under challenge before us by different assessees.

Under Section 12AB of the Act, it is the mandatory duty cast upon the CIT(E)/Principal Commissioner to conduct an enquiry about the activities of the Trust and to verify the objects as per the Trust deed and the genuineness of the activities of the Trust upon receipt of the relevant documents furnished by the assessee alongwith application for grant of registration of the Trust. Further that, the Commissioner is required to be satisfied himself about the genuineness of the activities of the trust and also to verify that these activities are in consonance with the objects of the Trust or Institution. Despite various opportunities as per the statutory provision, the assessee failed to submit the complete set of details and therefore, satisfaction in regard to the genuineness of the activities or verification of its activities whether the same is in consonance with its objects was unable to be arrived at by the Learned CIT(E) and the application for grant of the registration of the Trust under Section 12AB of the Act stood rejected.

In order to prevent the miscarriage of justice, present Tribunal find it fit and proper to provide another opportunity of being heard to the assessee in support of his case for registration of the Trust under Section 12AB of the Act. Appeal restored to the file of the Learned CIT(E) with a direction upon him to provide a further opportunity of being heard to the assessee and to consider the documents and/or evidence which the assessee would file as per the direction issued by the CIT(E). Appeal of assessee allowed.

Tags : REGISTRATION   GRANT   OPPORTUNITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved