J&K&L HC: Undenied Pleadings are Deemed Admitted by Implication under the CPC  ||  Kerala HC: Transfer Order Pending Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot be Disguised as Punishment  ||  Allahabad HC: GST, Incentives, 0r Festival Advances Cannot be Deducted From Employee’s Retiral Dues  ||  SC: Absconding Accused Cannot Claim Anticipatory Bail Solely Because a Co-Accused Was Acquitted  ||  Supreme Court: District Cricket Bodies Must Adopt Good Governance Voluntarily, Not Follow BCCI Rules  ||  Supreme Court: Post-Award Property Purchasers Cannot Resist Execution of an Arbitral Award  ||  SC: Telecom Spectrum is a Community Resource and its Ownership Cannot be Decided under the IBC  ||  SC: Police Failure to Invoke IPC Provisions Led to Contractor’s Acquittal in Cement Stockpiling Case  ||  SC: Bank’s Internal Classification of Debt as NPA Does Not Determine Limitation under the IBC  ||  Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees    

Meg. HC: HC/SC Can’t Interfere with Views of Specialized Body Unless Grossly Inappropriate - (10 Jul 2023)

CIVIL

Meghalaya High Court has held that body that deals with a particular type of matters is expected to have greater command over law applicable in the field and a Constitutional Court would not interfere with a view expressed on interpretation unless it appears to be grossly inappropriate.

Tags : MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT   SPECIALIZED BODY   CONSTITUTIONAL COURT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved