Bombay HC: National Security Justifies Denial of Police Clearance Certificate  ||  Bombay HC: Comic Remarks Without Malicious Intent Not Religious Insult  ||  J&K&L High Court: Scandalous Allegations Against Judicial Officers in Pleadings Impermissible  ||  P&H HC: Writ Petition Against Private Trust's Contractual Employment Dismissed  ||  Gujarat HC: Customary Divorce Entitles Daughter to Family Pension  ||  Calcutta HC: ECI's Prerogative to Deploy Central Employees as Counting Supervisors Upheld  ||  Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers    

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. Ajmera Associates Ltd, Mumbai - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (28 Jun 2023)

In case of unabated assessment years, the addition could be made only on the basis of any incriminating material found during the course of search

MANU/IU/0548/2023

Direct Taxation

The revenue is aggrieved by the decision of learned CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs.6.00 crore, being the loans taken by the assessee from Praveen Jain group of companies, under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act). In the cross objection, the assessee is contesting the validity of addition made in an unabated assessment year in the absence of any incriminating material.

It is well settled principle of law that, in case of unabated assessment years, the addition could be made only on the basis of any incriminating material found during the course of search, as per the decisions rendered by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation and CIT vs. Gurinder Singh Bawa.

In the instant case, the AO has made the impugned addition of Rs.6.00 crores on the basis of information already available in the return of income/completed assessment. It is not the case of the revenue that the search officials have unearthed any incriminating material, which revealed that the impugned loans are bogus in nature. The AO has made the addition on the basis of report of investigation wing, which cannot be considered as the incriminating material found during the course of search. Accordingly, in the absence of any incriminating material relating the above said addition of Rs.6.00 crores, the same could not have been added by the AO under Section 68 of the IT Act in the assessment completed under Section 153A read with Section 143(3) of the IT Act during the year under consideration, as it falls in the category of unabated assessment year. Accordingly, the decision of CIT(A) in deleting the impugned addition is confirmed. The appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the cross objection filed by the assessee is allowed.

Tags : ASSESSMENT   ADDITION   DELETION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved