NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

SC: Can’t Set Aside Decision to Allot Additional Shares Merely Because Promoters Have Also Benefited - (23 Jun 2023)

COMPANY

Supreme Court has held that largely disproportionate allotment of rights share in favour of one group of shareholders can’t be set aside merely because it substantially increases its shareholding percentage in the company over other group of shareholders and promoters have benefited from it.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PROMOTERS   SHAREHOLDING   SHARES   ALLOTMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved