SC: Menstrual Health is a Fundamental Right under Article 21; Orders Free Sanitary Pads in Schools  ||  Supreme Court: Industrial Court is the Proper Forum to Decide Issues Relating to Contract Labour  ||  Supreme Court: Only Civil Court of Original Jurisdiction Can Extend Arbitral Tribunal’s Mandate  ||  SC: Demolition of Private Property Must Rest on Clear Statutory Grounds and Due Consideration  ||  SC: After Complaint Was Withdrawn, BCI Disciplinary Committee Could Not Penalise Advocate  ||  MP HC: Decree Holder Cannot Defeat Compromise or Initiate Execution by Refusing Debtor’s Cheque  ||  MP HC: Spouse’s Income Cannot Be Clubbed With Public Servant’s for Disproportionate Assets Case  ||  Ker HC: Bar Association is Not Employer & Cannot Form Internal Complaints Committee under POSH Act  ||  SC: Ex-Contract Workers Must Be Preferred When Employers Replace Contract Labour With Regular Staff  ||  SC: Waqf Tribunals Cannot Hear Claims over Properties Not Listed or Registered under Waqf Act    

SC: Can’t Set Aside Decision to Allot Additional Shares Merely Because Promoters Have Also Benefited - (23 Jun 2023)

COMPANY

Supreme Court has held that largely disproportionate allotment of rights share in favour of one group of shareholders can’t be set aside merely because it substantially increases its shareholding percentage in the company over other group of shareholders and promoters have benefited from it.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PROMOTERS   SHAREHOLDING   SHARES   ALLOTMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved