SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

SC: Can’t Set Aside Decision to Allot Additional Shares Merely Because Promoters Have Also Benefited - (23 Jun 2023)

COMPANY

Supreme Court has held that largely disproportionate allotment of rights share in favour of one group of shareholders can’t be set aside merely because it substantially increases its shareholding percentage in the company over other group of shareholders and promoters have benefited from it.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PROMOTERS   SHAREHOLDING   SHARES   ALLOTMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved