SC: General Reference to a Tender’s Arbitration Clause Does Not Incorporate it into a Contract  ||  Supreme Court: Partnership Veil May be Lifted to Detect Illegal Sub-Letting Arrangements  ||  Supreme Court: Lower Dearness Relief For Pensioners than Employees' DA is Arbitrary under Article 14  ||  Supreme Court: NCLT Should Not Assess Merits of Pre-Existing Dispute in Section 9 Applications  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies that the Right to Vote is Not a Fundamental Right But a Statutory Right  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: Minor’s Voluntary Elopement With a Lover Does Not Constitute Kidnapping  ||  Bombay HC: Staring at Co-Worker’s Chest is Morally Wrong But Does Not Amount to Voyeurism under IPC  ||  Delhi HC: Loss of Confidence in Employees Entrusted With Funds is Valid Ground For Termination  ||  Allahabad High Court: Gram Nyayalaya Has Jurisdiction to Decide Maintenance and Execution Petitions  ||  J&K&L HC: Non-Publication of Sec 4(1) Notice in Gazette and Local Newspapers Vitiates Acquisition    

V. Sejappa v. State - (Supreme Court) (12 Apr 2016)

Mere handing over of currency notes not illegal gratification

MANU/SC/0494/2016

Criminal

Merely handing over money to a government official is insufficient to establish illegal gratification in the absence of proof of demand, the Supreme Court held.

The case at hand involved a government official having allegedly demanded Rs. 5000 from a retiree before he would sanction his retiral benefits and pension. Pursuant to a probe being conducted, the Appellant was found to have handled tainted money.

The court, however, was disinclined to be swayed by such singular evidence, noting that the Appellant was absent from office on official business when demand was made; there remained a dearth of evidence proving demand. It was also critical of the High Court’s failure to consider the defence that the amount paid by the retiree may have been for purchase of diesel.

Relevant : Umedbhai Jadavbhai Case MANU/SC/0164/1977 C.M. Sharma v. State of A.P. MANU/SC/0981/2010 Muralidhar alias Gidda and Anr. v. State of Karnataka MANU/SC/0294/2014

Tags : ILLEGAL GRATIFICATION   PROOF OF DEMAND  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved