Ker. HC: Centre to Consider Framing Sexual Harassment Laws With More Feminist Perspective  ||  Delhi HC: Centre Asked to Issue Instructions Regarding Identity of Victims in MTP Cases  ||  SC: Referral Courts at Referral Stage Must Not Venture into Questions Involving Complex Facts  ||  SC: Not Recording Reasons of Appointment of Junior Officer as Judge Adv. Invalidates Proceedings  ||  SC Clarifies Judgement on Entitlement of Govt. Employees to Increment Earned 1 Day Before Retirement  ||  Supreme Court Stays Defamation Proceedings Against Shashi Tharoor  ||  SC: Inordinate Delay in Conclusion of Trial Infringe Right of Accused Under Article 21  ||  SC Directs Registry to Not Accept Black & White Photographs Without Court’s Permission  ||  SC: NCLT to Exercise Power u/s 59 of Companies Act, if Applicant Victim of Open-and-Shut Fraud Case  ||  SC: HC Order to Hold 'One Day Elections' for Bar Association in Delhi, Stayed    

M.P. Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam Appellant (Indore) Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax and Central Excise - (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) (26 May 2023)

Demand under service tax on reverse charge mechanism has to be worked out and calculated transaction-wise and invoice-wise

MANU/CE/0227/2023

Service Tax

In present case, the Appellant is engaged in providing taxable services under the category of “Renting of Immovable Properties, Manpower Supply Services, Legal professional and Consultancy and Rent-a-Cab Services etc. The issue in present case is whether demand of service tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism has been rightly raised on the Appellant?

The Appellant states that, the impugned order is non-speaking and unreasoned. The whole demand is bad as the same has been confirmed without making a proper verification with respect to the facts on record.

The show cause notice does not contain the gist of allegations for raising the demand on RCM basis. The provisions of service tax read with the rules thereunder do not provide for raising of demand on the basis of apparent difference in the figure of expenses in the balance sheet and the amount offered for service tax in the ST-3 Returns. The demand under service tax on reverse charge mechanism, has to be worked out and calculated transaction wise-wise and invoice-wise.

In absence of such exercise, the show cause notices is vague and fit to be held misconceived and mis-directed. The Appellant shall be entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with law. The impugned order is set aside. Appeal allowed.

Tags : DEMAND   RCM   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved