NCLAT: Resolution Professional Can’t Admit Claims Based On Uninvoked Guarantee  ||  NCLAT: Upon Approval of Resolution Plan, Claims not Included in RP Stand Extinguished  ||  All. HC: Police Must Ensure that Movement of Lawyers to Court is Unhindered  ||  Mad. HC: Can’t Bar Court from Entertaining more than One Application u/s 29A of A&C Act  ||  Kar. HC: Can Quash Cr. Proceedings on Basis of Witness Statements only in Rare Cases  ||  Kar. HC: Can’t Transfer Probe to CBI Merely because Accused is Sitting CM  ||  Bom. HC Issues Contempt Notice against Woman Circulating Objectionable Comments against SC & HC  ||  Del. HC Upholds Validity of Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013  ||  Mad. HC: Provision Preventing Arrest of Women is Directory not Mandatory  ||  Del. HC: Bald Allegations against IO Insufficient for Transferring Probe to Another Agency    

Ker. HC: Acts Done by Bank Officials While Taking Possession are Protected Under SARFAESI Act - (25 May 2023)

BANKING

Kerala High Court while observing that action taken by the officials of the bank under the SARFAESI Act is neither unquestionable nor treated as sacrosanct under all circumstances, has held that officials are protected from criminal prosecution under Section 32 of SARFAESI Act.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   BANK OFFICIALS   SARFAESI   PROSECUTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved