Supreme Court Rejects Plea Seeking Vehicle Star-Rating System to Curb Air Pollution  ||  SC Declines to Order Disclosure of CIC Shortlisted Candidates, Sees No Reason to Doubt Union  ||  Kerala HC: “Debt Due” under Section 18(1) SARFAESI Act Includes Future Interest until Appeal Filing  ||  Kerala HC: Interim Bail Period Not Counted as ‘Detention’ for Statutory Bail under S.187 BNSS  ||  Madras HC: Cryptocurrency is Property and Can be Held in Trust  ||  NCLAT Chennai: Guarantors Cannot Deny Demand Notice After Admitting its Receipt  ||  Kerala HC: Ex-CISF Personnel can Buy Liquor from CAPF Canteens  ||  Kerala HC: Accused Can Respond Virtually or in Writing  ||  Kerala HC: No Caste or Lineage Required for Temple Priests  ||  Kerala HC Orders SIT Probe into Sabarimala Gold Loss    

Roche Products v. Drugs Controller General of India and ors - (High Court of Delhi) (25 Apr 2016)

Delhi High Court to delve into Drug Controller irregularities

Civil

The Delhi High Court deferred a dispute regarding the development, classification and promotion of bio-similar drugs to 2 June 2016. Brought by Roche Products, the plaint raised concerns about irregularities by the Drug Controller General of India in granting approval to Biocon Limited and Mylan Pharmaceuticals for a bio-similar drug in five days - a process which usually takes much longer than that due to deliberation by three separate bodies, before it reaches the DCGI. The drug in question is Trastuzumab, used for treatment of breast cancer.

The Court accepted Roche’s arguments, ruling that “approvals…are not on the basis of the adherence of the Guidelines of 2012 and rules framed”. However, final finding would be arrived at upon completion of trial. The Defendants were allowed to continue manufacturing and marketing their drug claiming bio-similarity with Roche’s drug, but with certain provisos on indication used on packaging.

Tags : TRASTUZUMAB   BIO-SIMILAR   DCGI   ROCHE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved