Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

AOs to not issue penalty notices under Sections 271D,E of IT Act- (Ministry of Finance ) (26 Apr 2016)

MANU/DTCR/0012/2016

Direct Taxation

The Central Board of Direct Taxes set forth a “Departmental View” to assuage conflicting notions on the limitation for imposition of penalty under Section 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act 1961. Confusion prevail over whether such penalties commenced at the level of the Assessing Officer or from the Joint/Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. The Board clarified that Assessing Officers are not empowered to impose such penalties.

It accepted the ruling of the Kerala High Court in a 2015 case in which it determined that penalty proceedings could only be initiated by the Joint Commissioner, with the Assessing Officer unable to do so. If the AO’s assessment order was taken as the point of initiation of initiation of penalty, the same would be inconsequential, and proceedings thereupon would be redundant.

The CBDT’s “view” may be scripture for officers of the Department, but whether High Courts ascribe to the same remains to be seen.

Relevant : Limitation for penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E MANU/DTCR/0013/2016

Tags : INCOME TAX   PENALTY NOTICE   LIMITATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved