Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations  ||  Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary  ||  Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother  ||  Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly  ||  Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay  ||  Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State  ||  Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders    

AOs to not issue penalty notices under Sections 271D,E of IT Act- (Ministry of Finance ) (26 Apr 2016)

MANU/DTCR/0012/2016

Direct Taxation

The Central Board of Direct Taxes set forth a “Departmental View” to assuage conflicting notions on the limitation for imposition of penalty under Section 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act 1961. Confusion prevail over whether such penalties commenced at the level of the Assessing Officer or from the Joint/Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. The Board clarified that Assessing Officers are not empowered to impose such penalties.

It accepted the ruling of the Kerala High Court in a 2015 case in which it determined that penalty proceedings could only be initiated by the Joint Commissioner, with the Assessing Officer unable to do so. If the AO’s assessment order was taken as the point of initiation of initiation of penalty, the same would be inconsequential, and proceedings thereupon would be redundant.

The CBDT’s “view” may be scripture for officers of the Department, but whether High Courts ascribe to the same remains to be seen.

Relevant : Limitation for penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E MANU/DTCR/0013/2016

Tags : INCOME TAX   PENALTY NOTICE   LIMITATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved