P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

AOs to not issue penalty notices under Sections 271D,E of IT Act- (Ministry of Finance ) (26 Apr 2016)

MANU/DTCR/0012/2016

Direct Taxation

The Central Board of Direct Taxes set forth a “Departmental View” to assuage conflicting notions on the limitation for imposition of penalty under Section 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act 1961. Confusion prevail over whether such penalties commenced at the level of the Assessing Officer or from the Joint/Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. The Board clarified that Assessing Officers are not empowered to impose such penalties.

It accepted the ruling of the Kerala High Court in a 2015 case in which it determined that penalty proceedings could only be initiated by the Joint Commissioner, with the Assessing Officer unable to do so. If the AO’s assessment order was taken as the point of initiation of initiation of penalty, the same would be inconsequential, and proceedings thereupon would be redundant.

The CBDT’s “view” may be scripture for officers of the Department, but whether High Courts ascribe to the same remains to be seen.

Relevant : Limitation for penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E MANU/DTCR/0013/2016

Tags : INCOME TAX   PENALTY NOTICE   LIMITATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved