Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Jeevan Kalyana Sadhan vs. ITO - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (02 Mar 2023)

Audit report can be filed even at the appellate stage

MANU/IF/0031/2023

Direct Taxation

The assessee is a trust, which had filed its return of income for the relevant assessment year year. However, when the return of income was filed, the auditors of the assessee had failed to include the Form 10B being the audit report alongwith return of income. It was the submission that, the due date for filing the audit report was 30.9.2015 and the mistake in filing of the audit report was noticed and same was rectified on 21.11.2019. It was the submission that on appeal, the learned CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal on the ground that ignorance of law is not an excuse. It was the submission that the assessee is dependent on its Chartered Accountant and Auditors for filing the return. The mistake done by the auditors should not put the assessee on a disadvantage position as long as the assessee has not been found to be perse at fault.

A perusal of the decision of the High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shahzedanand Charity Trust clearly shows that the Hon'ble P&H High Court has categorically held that the audit report under Section 12A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be filed even at the appellate stage. Thus, High Court has held that the filing of the audit report alongwith the return as per provisions of section 12A(1)(b) of the Act is not mandatory.

The audit has been done within time in the case of the assessee and it is only the audit report which has not been filed within the time prescribed. This is only a venial breach of the provisions. The assessee should not be denied the benefit of deduction under Section 11 and 12 of the Act on account of the said venial breach in respect of the delay in filing of the audit report. Consequently, the delay in filing of the audit report in Form 10B is condoned and the Assessing Officer is directed to consider the same when computing the income of the assessee. Appeal of the assessee stands allowed.

Tags : AUDIT REPORT   ASSESSMENT   RETURN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved