NCLAT: Corporate Debtor’s Guarantor Liability Unchanged Despite Internal Adjustments Among Creditors  ||  NCLAT: Plea under IBC Section 7 Can't Be Restored After Corporate Debtor Pays Principal & Interest  ||  Delhi HC: Wife Can Be Denied Maintenance If She Fails To Submit Latest Salary Slips  ||  Kerala HC: Income of Parent Who Abandoned Family Shouldn’t Count For EWS Reservation Eligibility  ||  Gujarat HC: Writ Courts Interfering in Arbitral Procedure Orders Defies A&C Act’s Purpose  ||  Delhi HC: Plaintiff Doesn’t Have Vested Right to File Rejoinder under CPC  ||  J&K&L HC: Name Change Is Fundamental Right; Boards Must Consider Legal Documents, Not Reject Request  ||  SC: Administrative Delays by State Agencies Must Not Be Condoned  ||  Sc: When Sale Deed Is Void, Possession Suit Follows 12-Year Limitation under Article 65, Not Art 59  ||  SC: Preliminary Inquiry Report Can’t Stop Court from Directing FIR Registration    

Union of India v. Harish Chandra Singh Rawat and Anr. - (22 Apr 2016)

President’s Rule in Uttarakhand to stay for now

Constitution

The Supreme Court put paid to hopes that President’s Rule in the State of Uttarakhand will be a short one. It stayed an order of the Uttarakhand High Court which purported a “floor test” for a vote of confidence, given the legislative assembly was suspended, not dissolved. Instead, the Apex court belayed the order till 27 April 2016, on which date it will hear the matter.

President’s Rule in Uttarakhand came about after the State’s Appropriation Bill for 2016 was passed by voice vote, and it is alleged, without a majority; opposition MLAs and nine MLAs of the ruling party in the State were opposed to the Bill. Subsequently, with further enquiries belong made, show cause notices to the nine MLAs from the ruling party were sent, after disqualification petitions were filed by the Chief Whip of the party. A vote of confidence was called for by the Governor: Chief Minister informing him of the same to have been scheduled for 28 March 2016. On 27 March 2016, however, the Union Cabinet imposed President’s Rule in the State.

Relevant : Harish Chandra Singh Rawat v. Union of India and Ors MANU/UC/0007/2016 S.R. Bommai and others v. Union of India and others MANU/SC/0444/1994

Tags : PRESIDENT’S RULE   UTTARAKHAND   APPROPRIATION BILL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved