Allahabad HC: MPs, Judges and Ministers May Use ‘Hon’ble’; Civil Servants are Not Entitled to it || Calcutta HC: Salary Withholding and Harassment Claims are Not Defamation Without Reputational Harm || Gauhati HC: Officer Resigning Without New Govt Appointment Cannot Claim Pension under Assam Service || MP HC: Attachment & Auction are Quasi-Judicial Duties of Tehsildar; Action Invalid Without Mala Fide || Supreme Court: Fence-Sitters Cannot Raise Seniority Disputes Once Third-Party Rights are Settled || SC: Medical Negligence Claims Can be Filed Against Deceased Doctor’s Legal Heirs Who Inherit Estate || Supreme Court: Bail Must Be Considered if Speedy Trial Rights are Violated, Regardless of Offence || Supreme Court: Article 226 Cannot be Used to Seek FIR Registration Without Exhausting Remedies || SC: Dowry Deaths Remain a Grave Social Issue, Especially in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Karnataka || Supreme Court Outlines Principles Governing Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 227

Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts- (Reserve Bank of India) (18 Apr 2016)

MANU/RMIC/0065/2016

Banking

Reserve Bank of India notified amendments to provisions in respect of Fraud Accounts. Banks making good amounts upon detection of fraud can adjust financial collateral eligible under Basel III Capital Regulations - Capital Charge for Credit Risk (Standardised Risk). Adjustments can be made over a period of four quarters, to not adversely affect quarterly profit and loss. If banks choose to adjust the fraud over a period spanning two to four quarters, all not falling under the same financial year, they should debit ‘other reserves’ by the amount being carried over to the subsequent financial year.

Relevant : Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts MANU/RMIC/0132/2015

Tags : FRAUD ACCOUNTS BANKS ADJUSTMENT PROFIT AND LOSS

Share :