J&K&L HC: Matrimonial Remedies May Overlap, But Cruelty Claims Cannot be Selectively Invoked || Delhi High Court: Customs Officials Acting Officially Cannot be Cross-Examined as of Right || J&K&L HC: Second Arbitral Reference is Maintainable if Award is Set Aside Without Deciding Merits || J&K&L HC: Gold Voluntarily Given to Customer is 'Entrustment'; Theft Excluded from Insurance Cover || Delhi HC: Working Mothers Cannot be Forced to Bear Full Childcare Burden While Fathers Evade Duty || J&K&L HC: Arbitral Tribunal Not a “Court”; Giving False Evidence Before it Doesn’t Attract S.195 CrPC || Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses || Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out || Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease || Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory

Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts- (Reserve Bank of India) (18 Apr 2016)

MANU/RMIC/0065/2016

Banking

Reserve Bank of India notified amendments to provisions in respect of Fraud Accounts. Banks making good amounts upon detection of fraud can adjust financial collateral eligible under Basel III Capital Regulations - Capital Charge for Credit Risk (Standardised Risk). Adjustments can be made over a period of four quarters, to not adversely affect quarterly profit and loss. If banks choose to adjust the fraud over a period spanning two to four quarters, all not falling under the same financial year, they should debit ‘other reserves’ by the amount being carried over to the subsequent financial year.

Relevant : Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts MANU/RMIC/0132/2015

Tags : FRAUD ACCOUNTS BANKS ADJUSTMENT PROFIT AND LOSS

Share :