Kerala HC: Revisional Power U/S 263 Not Invocable When AO Grants Sec 32AC Deduction After Inquiry || J&K&L HC: Section 359 BNSS Doesn’t Limit High Court’s Inherent Power U/S 528 to Quash FIRs || Bombay HC: BMC Ban on Footpath Cooking via Gas/Grill Doesn’t Apply to Vendors Using Induction || Madras HC: Buyer Not Liable for Seller’s Tax Default; Purchase Tax Can’t Be Imposed under TNGST Act || Kerala HC: Oral Allegations Alone Insufficient to Sustain Bribery Charges Against Ministers || Delhi HC: CCI Cannot Levy Interest Retrospectively Before Valid Service of Demand Notice || Delhi HC: VC Rules Don’t Shield PMLA Accused From Physically Appearing Before ED in Probe || SC: If Complaint Reveals Cognizable Offence, Magistrate May Order FIR Registration U/S .156(3) CrPC || SC: Private Buses Can’t Operate on Inter-State Routes Overlapping Notified State Transport Routes || Delhi HC: Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Provisional Attachment When PMLA Remedy Exists

Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts- (Reserve Bank of India) (18 Apr 2016)

MANU/RMIC/0065/2016

Banking

Reserve Bank of India notified amendments to provisions in respect of Fraud Accounts. Banks making good amounts upon detection of fraud can adjust financial collateral eligible under Basel III Capital Regulations - Capital Charge for Credit Risk (Standardised Risk). Adjustments can be made over a period of four quarters, to not adversely affect quarterly profit and loss. If banks choose to adjust the fraud over a period spanning two to four quarters, all not falling under the same financial year, they should debit ‘other reserves’ by the amount being carried over to the subsequent financial year.

Relevant : Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts MANU/RMIC/0132/2015

Tags : FRAUD ACCOUNTS BANKS ADJUSTMENT PROFIT AND LOSS

Share :