SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC || Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued || MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance || Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected || Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent || Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists || Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid || Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law || Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports || Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists

Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts- (Reserve Bank of India) (18 Apr 2016)

MANU/RMIC/0065/2016

Banking

Reserve Bank of India notified amendments to provisions in respect of Fraud Accounts. Banks making good amounts upon detection of fraud can adjust financial collateral eligible under Basel III Capital Regulations - Capital Charge for Credit Risk (Standardised Risk). Adjustments can be made over a period of four quarters, to not adversely affect quarterly profit and loss. If banks choose to adjust the fraud over a period spanning two to four quarters, all not falling under the same financial year, they should debit ‘other reserves’ by the amount being carried over to the subsequent financial year.

Relevant : Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts MANU/RMIC/0132/2015

Tags : FRAUD ACCOUNTS BANKS ADJUSTMENT PROFIT AND LOSS

Share :