Calcutta HC: Employee Looking for Another Job with Rival Company Isn’t Contrary  ||  Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered  ||  Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered  ||  Allahabad HC: No Power on Police to Open History-Sheet on Likes or Dislikes  ||  Rajasthan HC Puts Stay on Installation of Dairy Booth Outside Private Residence  ||  Calcutta HC: Cannot Summon Accused to Produce Incriminating Evidence against Himself  ||  Kerala HC Upholds STA’s decision mandating installation of cameras with Fatigue Detection Censors  ||  SC: Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Recruitment Processes  ||  Delhi Lieutenant Governor’s Notification regarding Evidence of Police officers Put on Hold  ||  SC Issues Notice in Plea to Bring Bar Councils under POSH Act    

Manjeet Kaur Monga v. K.L. Suneja and Ors. - (Competition Appellate Tribunal) (03 Aug 2015)

Cancelling allotment for non-payment of installments towards delayed construction constitutes unfair trade practice

MANU/TA/0040/2015

MRTP/ Competition Laws

In a case where the Complainant stopped depositing installments towards a flat for failure to complete construction within the stipulated time, the Tribunal held the Respondent's act of cancelling the allotment to be an unfair trade practice. Despite demands for information by the Complainant, the Respondents had failed to respond to her communications and keep her apprised about the progress made. The Tribunal held the Complainant to be justified in stopping payment of further installments. Though it had authority to award compensation to the Complainants, the Tribunal could not compel the Respondents to grant physical possession of the flat to the Complainant.

Relevant : Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs. Ved Prakash Aggarwal MANU/SC/7712/2008 V.N. Bharat Vs. DDA and another MANU/SC/8009/2008

Tags : DELAYED CONSTRUCTION   INSTALLMENT   CANCELLATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved