Kerala HC: Physiotherapists and Occupational Therapists Cannot Use “Dr.” Without Medical Degree  ||  Delhi High Court: Law Firms Must Verify Cited Case Laws; Senior Counsel Not Responsible for Finality  ||  MP High Court Dismisses Shah Bano’s Daughter’s Plea, Rules ‘Haq’ Movie is Fiction  ||  Bombay HC Cancels ERC Order, Rules Stakeholders Must Be Heard Before Amending Multi-Year Tariff  ||  Calcutta High Court Rules Dunlop’s Second Appeal Not Maintainable under the Trade Marks Act  ||  Kerala HC: Revisional Power U/S 263 Not Invocable When AO Grants Sec 32AC Deduction After Inquiry  ||  J&K&L HC: Section 359 BNSS Doesn’t Limit High Court’s Inherent Power U/S 528 to Quash FIRs  ||  Bombay HC: BMC Ban on Footpath Cooking via Gas/Grill Doesn’t Apply to Vendors Using Induction  ||  Madras HC: Buyer Not Liable for Seller’s Tax Default; Purchase Tax Can’t Be Imposed under TNGST Act  ||  Kerala HC: Oral Allegations Alone Insufficient to Sustain Bribery Charges Against Ministers    

A.K. Nithyanandham v. Saraswthi Velusamy and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (13 Aug 2015)

Plaintiff must establish shape and active functioning of partnership if made orally

MANU/TN/2527/2015

Civil

A right to participate in the profits of the trade does not, by itself, demonstrate the existence of a partnership; the relationship also depends on the intention and contract of the parties. Though the Court ascertained an agreement to share profits, it noted that the firm's business was primarily carried on by the Appellant, who also held much of the property in his own name. The Respondent had not averred that it was on her behalf the Appellant had done the same.

Relevant : Section 69 Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Act Paras Nath Thakur v. Smt. Mohani Dasi (deceased) MANU/SC/0156/1959 Yadarao Dajiba Shrawane (dead) by L.Rs. v. Nanilal Harakchand Shah (dead) & others MANU/SC/0639/2002

Tags : PARTNERSHIP   EXISTENCE   INTENTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved