Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations  ||  Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary  ||  Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother  ||  Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly  ||  Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay  ||  Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State  ||  Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders    

A.K. Nithyanandham v. Saraswthi Velusamy and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (13 Aug 2015)

Plaintiff must establish shape and active functioning of partnership if made orally

MANU/TN/2527/2015

Civil

A right to participate in the profits of the trade does not, by itself, demonstrate the existence of a partnership; the relationship also depends on the intention and contract of the parties. Though the Court ascertained an agreement to share profits, it noted that the firm's business was primarily carried on by the Appellant, who also held much of the property in his own name. The Respondent had not averred that it was on her behalf the Appellant had done the same.

Relevant : Section 69 Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Act Paras Nath Thakur v. Smt. Mohani Dasi (deceased) MANU/SC/0156/1959 Yadarao Dajiba Shrawane (dead) by L.Rs. v. Nanilal Harakchand Shah (dead) & others MANU/SC/0639/2002

Tags : PARTNERSHIP   EXISTENCE   INTENTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved