P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Ram Lakhan v. State of U.P. and Ors. - (08 Apr 2016)

Court covers its ears amidst religious caterwauling

MANU/UP/0498/2016

Environment

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court avoided, narrowly, being dragged into a controversial religious debate about the use of loudspeakers during prayer time.

The Petitioners alleged that being Hindus in a UP village, and claiming to be minority in the locality, they were prohibited from using loudspeakers to play devotional songs in a temple during the morning and evening ‘aarti’. Adding ghee to the smouldering fire, they claimed discrimination by the administration as the muslim population in the town was not prohibited from using loudspeakers mounted atop mosques.

Deeming it best to not pass a quixotic judgment on the use of loudspeakers for devotion at places of worship, the court soliloquised the social, legal and physiological impact of forcing a “captive audience”.

Referring to law laid down previously, the court reiterated the impermissibility of use of loudspeakers by any community, and that reasonable restrictions would have to be respected. It offered the Petitioners the option of formally approaching the competent authority to apply for permission to use loudspeakers.

Quite agnostic of religion, courts are inundated by citizens’ complaints against the harmful use of loudspeakers to blast out religious and other fervour. In fact, scientific research has shown noise pollution to cause nervous disorders, raised blood pressure, cardiovascular disease and risks to the foetus in the case of pregnant women.

Relevant : Church of God (Full Gospel) in India. v. K.K.R. Majestic Colony Welfare Association and others. MANU/SC/0537/2000 In Re: Noise Pollution - Implementation of the Laws for restricting use of loudspeakers and high volume producing sound systems MANU/SC/0415/2005 Rabin Mukherjee and Ors. vs. State of West Bengal and Ors. MANU/WB/0058/1985

Tags : PUBLIC NUISANCE   LOUDSPEAKER   TEMPLE   RELIGIOUS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved