Supreme Court: Foreign Judgment Unenforceable in India Without Fair Opportunity to Defend  ||  Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Decide Appeal Pending Before Statutory Authority Due to Delay  ||  Supreme Court: SDO Lacks Authority to Change Land Classification under UP Zamindari Abolition Act  ||  Supreme Court: Man Not Liable For Maintenance if DNA Test Proves He is Not the Child’s Father  ||  SC: Prison Must Not Dilute Rights of Disabled Inmates; Oversight Given to High-Powered Panel  ||  Delhi High Court: Judges Would Have to Recuse if Children as Central Govt Counsel is Treated as Bias  ||  Delhi HC: Fresh Tenders Allowed Despite Existing Contracts; Anticipatory Grievances Not Entertained  ||  Delhi High Court: Judges Cannot Respond Publicly; Criticism Must Be Responsible and Evidence-Based  ||  J&K&L High Court: IO Not Bound By FIR; Can Modify Offences in Final Chargesheet U/S 173 CrPC  ||  Supreme Court: Brief Service Breaks Do Not Bar Ad Hoc Employees From Regularisation    

Amendment of Guidance Note on insider trading regulations- (Securities and Exchange Board of India) (12 Apr 2016)

MANU/SPRL/0076/2016

Capital Market

The Securities and Exchange Board of India issued amendments to its guidance note on the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015. Amendments are in light of recent changes by which dissenting shareholders were afforded an exit opportunity and the restriction of ‘contra-trade’ would not apply. With the latest amendment, the exit offer is also exempted from the restricton on contra trade under the Regulations.

Tags : SEBI   INSIDER TRADING   EXIT OPPRTUNITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved