NCLAT: Can File App. u/s 7 of IBC when Entire Liability Not Discharged after Selling Pledged Shares  ||  NCLAT: Recovery Proceedings before DRT doesn’t Prohibit Financial Creditors from Filing App. u/s 7  ||  Ker. HC: Women Face Discrimination at Multiple Level Due to their Inter- Sectionality  ||  Del. HC: Amounts Received by ERC under Filing Fee, Tariff Fee Not Exigible to Tax  ||  Ker. HC: Equity, Justice, Convenience Govern the Question Whether Joint Trial is Required or Not  ||  Ker. HC: Equity, Justice, Convenience Govern the Question Whether Joint Trial is Required or Not  ||  Delhi HC: Benchmark of Rs. 50 Lakh Income to be Met at Initiation of Reassessment Proceedings  ||  MP HC: No Prohibition on Issuance of Passport without Father’s Consent  ||  Del. HC: Samsung India Electronics is Not Samsung Korea’s Permanent Establishment in India  ||  Guj. HC: Machines Used for Welding in Residential Society is Nuisance    

Raj. HC: Setting Different Retirement Age for Allopathic & Ayurvedic Doctors Unconstitutional - (04 Oct 2022)

SERVICE

Rajasthan High Court has held that distinction created between Allopathic and Ayurvedic doctors by setting different retirement ages, is unconstitutional as it was discriminatory and impermissible in law under Article 14 of the Constitution.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   UNCONSTITUTIONAL   RETIREMENT AGE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved