SC: SARFAESI Act Was Not Applicable in Nagaland Before its 2021 Adoption, Dismisses Creditor’s Plea  ||  SC: Lis Pendens Applies To Money Suits on Mortgaged Property, Including Ex Parte Proceedings  ||  Kerala HC: Civil Courts Cannot Grant Injunctions in NCLT Matters and Such Orders Can Be Set Aside  ||  Bombay High Court: Technical Breaks to Temporary Employees Cannot Deny Maternity Leave Benefits  ||  NCLAT: Appellate Jurisdiction Limited to Orders Deciding Parties’ Rights, Not Procedural Directions  ||  NCLAT: Personal Guarantors Involved In NCLT Proceedings Can Appeal Against Insolvency Admission  ||  Supreme Court: Foreign Companies’ Head Office Expenses in India are Capped under Section 44C  ||  SC Directs Trial Courts to Systematically Catalogue Witnesses and Evidence in Criminal Judgments  ||  SC Calls For Sensitising Future Generations on Equality in Marriage to Combat Dowry Practices  ||  SC: Separate Suits Against Confirmed Auction Sales are Barred; Remedy Available under Sec 47    

Raj. HC: Setting Different Retirement Age for Allopathic & Ayurvedic Doctors Unconstitutional - (04 Oct 2022)

SERVICE

Rajasthan High Court has held that distinction created between Allopathic and Ayurvedic doctors by setting different retirement ages, is unconstitutional as it was discriminatory and impermissible in law under Article 14 of the Constitution.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   UNCONSTITUTIONAL   RETIREMENT AGE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved