Supreme Court Rebukes RBI for Remaining a Bystander as YES Bank Operated Clandestinely  ||  Supreme Court: Lower Fresh Bids Alone Cannot Justify Cancellation of an Auction  ||  Supreme Court Directs Delhi Police to Produce Section 163 BNSS Orders and Preserve CCTV Footage  ||  Supreme Court Affirms Menstrual Hygiene as a Fundamental Right, Warns States of Contempt  ||  Supreme Court Flags AI-Generated Fake Judgments Submitted in a Party’s Case Compilation  ||  Karnataka High Court: Vijay Mallya’s Flamboyant Lifestyle Hinders Settlement of Bank Claims  ||  Delhi High Court: Women can be Booked for Gang Rape without Physically Committing it  ||  Delhi High Court: Litigants Must Track Their Cases and Cannot Blame Lawyers for Their Own Inaction  ||  Allahabad High Court: Contract Workers Must Prove Work Parity With Regular Staff for Equal Pay  ||  Allahabad High Court Directs UP Trial Courts to Decide Maintenance Execution Cases Within Six Months    

Jakovich vs. 3 Mood design Pty Ltd. - (25 Aug 2022)

After passing of resolution for voluntary winding up, no action or other civil proceeding is to be proceeded with or commenced against the company except by leave of the Court

Commercial

Present is an application made pursuant to Section 500(2) of the Corporations Act, 2001. The Plaintiff seeks to be granted leave nunc pro tunc to proceed with an action in the State Administrative Tribunal referred under the Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act, 2011 (WA) (the SAT proceedings).

Section 500(2) of the Corporations Act, 2001 provides that after the passing of the resolution for voluntary winding up, no action or other civil proceeding is to be proceeded with or commenced against the company except by leave of the Court and subject to such terms as the Court imposes. Leave to proceed against the defendant for the purposes of obtaining access to documents would not affect the administration of the winding up of the company or prejudice the other creditors.

Granting leave would enable Mr. Jakovich to apply to the Tribunal for orders concerning the conduct of the proceedings including the production of documents as it sees fit under Section 32 or Section 34 of the State Administrative Tribunal Act, 2004. Leave may not be strictly necessary to obtain production of documents under a subpoena. However, rather than invite further argument as to whether that is the case and the difficulties to which Mr. Jakovich deposes in obtaining documents from the liquidator, present Court is satisfied Mr. Jakovich requires this Court's assistance to facilitate the bringing of an action against the defendant to enable him to seek orders to compel the production of documents in the SAT proceedings.

Pursuant to Section 500(2) of the Corporations Act, 2001, the Plaintiff has leave to proceed nunc pro tunc against the Defendant, 3 Moon Design Pty Ltd (in liq) in the proceedings in the State Administrative Tribunal on condition that: (a) any costs order not be sought or made against the defendant; and (b) any other monetary order is not enforced against the Defendant.

Tags : VOLUNTARY WINDING UP   PROCEEDING   LEAVE OF COURT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved