Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

Income-tax (Twenty Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2022- (Ministry of Finance ) (22 Aug 2022)

MANU/CBDT/0112/2022

Direct Taxation

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 115TD read with section 295, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:-

1. Short title and commencement.--

(1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (Twenty Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2022.

(2) They shall come into force from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in rule 17CB,-

(i) for the words "trust or institution" wherever they occur, the words "specified person" shall be substituted;

(ii) in Explanation, after clause (h), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:-

'(ha) "specified person" shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (iia) of the Explanation to section 115TD;'.

Tags : RULES   AMENDMENT   SUBSTITUTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved