Delhi HC: Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Provisional Attachment When PMLA Remedy Exists  ||  Rajasthan HC: Magistrate Can’t Order Secured Creditor to Pay Police Expenses For Asset Possession  ||  Orissa HC: Court Can’t Permit Intervenors Without Reason or Compel Plaintiff to Join Unrelated Party  ||  Delhi HC: Section 498A IPC Applies Even if Marriage is Later Declared Invalid  ||  AP HC: State Can’t Cite Financial Constraints to Withhold Gratuity, Denying Retirees Violates Art 21  ||  Madras HC: Marriage Does Not Grant Men Absolute Authority, Woman’s Endurance is Not Consent  ||  Delhi HC: Ordinary Marital Friction or Taunts Do Not Constitute Cruelty under Law  ||  Punjab & Haryana HC: Family Property Disputes Cannot Be Resolved under Maintenance of Parents Act  ||  Delhi HC: Bribe Profits Invested in Shares Are Proceeds of Crime and Attachable under PMLA  ||  Delhi HC: 'No Coercive Steps' Does Not Mean Stay or Suspension of Investigation    

SC Declares Section 3(2) of Benami Transactions Prohibition Act as Unconstitutional - (23 Aug 2022)

CIVIL

Supreme Court has held that Section 3(2) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act 1988 as unconstitutional on the ground of being manifestly arbitrary and violative of Article 20(1) of the Constitution. The Court also held that the 2016 amendment to the Act cannot be applied retrospectively.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   BENAMI TRANSACTION   UNCONSTITUTIONAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved