P&H HC: Constitution isn’t Privilege Charter; Reservation in Promotions Requires Statutory Amendment  ||  Kerala HC: Law Must be Amended to Hold Landowners Liable for Illegal Paddy Land Reclamation  ||  Bombay HC: Parents Saying Daughter was Unhappy, Wept Often not Enough to Convict under 498A IPC  ||  Kerala HC: Physiotherapists and Occupational Therapists Cannot Use “Dr.” Without Medical Degree  ||  Delhi High Court: Law Firms Must Verify Cited Case Laws; Senior Counsel Not Responsible for Finality  ||  MP High Court Dismisses Shah Bano’s Daughter’s Plea, Rules ‘Haq’ Movie is Fiction  ||  Bombay HC Cancels ERC Order, Rules Stakeholders Must Be Heard Before Amending Multi-Year Tariff  ||  Calcutta High Court Rules Dunlop’s Second Appeal Not Maintainable under the Trade Marks Act  ||  Kerala HC: Revisional Power U/S 263 Not Invocable When AO Grants Sec 32AC Deduction After Inquiry  ||  J&K&L HC: Section 359 BNSS Doesn’t Limit High Court’s Inherent Power U/S 528 to Quash FIRs    

SC: Question of Constitutional Validity Cannot be Dealt in a Casual/Cryptic Manner - (29 Jul 2022)

CONSTITUTION

Supreme Court while setting aside Karnataka High Court judgment which held Section 20 of Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973 as unconstitutional has held that High Court dealt with issue in cryptic manner without analyzing all relevant aspects needed to be considered by Court.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   UNCONSTITUTIONAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved