NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

ITAT: Money Can’t be Treated as ‘Unaccounted’ Merely Because of Non-Response from Creditors - (26 Jul 2022)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi bench, while deleting penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has held that the money cannot be treated as ‘unaccounted’ merely because of non-response from the creditors solely because of non-response from the creditors.

Tags : ITAT   CREDITORS   UNACCOUNTED  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved