Allahabad HC: Police Report in Non-Cognizable Offence is a Complaint; Accused Must Be Heard First  ||  Kerala HC: Hospitals Must Display Rates and Cannot Deny Emergency Care For Lack of Advance Payment  ||  Orissa HC: Convict’s Refusal to Appeal Through Legal Aid Must be Recorded in Writing  ||  SC Halts Deer Translocation From Delhi’s AN Jha Park And Orders a Probe into DDA Negligence  ||  Supreme Court: The Growing Trend of Succeeding Benches Overturning Earlier Judgments is Troubling  ||  SC: Administrative Orders Must be Based on Stated Reasons and Cannot Add New Grounds Later  ||  HP HC: Mixing Contraband Pouches Before Sampling Raises Serious Doubts About Accused's Possession  ||  Bombay HC: Drug Names Using International Non-Proprietary Names Cannot be Monopolized  ||  Delhi High Court: Assets From Illegal Cricket Betting are Proceeds of Crime Attachable by ED  ||  Delhi HC: Extension to Issue SCN U/S 110 of The Customs Act Must be Granted Before Six Months Expire    

CESTAT: Law Does Not Mandate Customs Broker to Physically Verify Address of Client - (05 Jul 2022)

CUSTOMS

Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi bench has held that it is not mandatory for Customs Broker to physically verify the address of the Client and such verification based on the Government documents including GSTIN was sufficient.

Tags : CESTAT   CUSTOMS BROKER   VERIFICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved