Cal. HC: Cannot Differentiate Between Contractual and Permanent Employees For Maternity Leave  ||  Supreme Court: Entering Into Sale Agreement With Minor is Void and Unenforceable  ||  SC: Information Disclosing Cognizable Offence to Be Recorded as FIR & Not in General Diary  ||  Delhi High Court: Deployment of CISF Personnel Shall be Based on Operational Requirements  ||  All. HC: Returning Unpaid Check With Endorsement of Account Closed Amounts to Dishnonor of Cheque  ||  Karnataka HC: Courts Should Ensure That Legal Procedures Are Not Abused in Order to Reduce Burden  ||  Utt. HC: Joining in Service Cannot Be Denied to Woman on The Ground of Her Pregnancy  ||  Kar. HC: Can’t Stretch Protection u/a 21 to Those Posing Threat to Nation’s Sovereignty & Integrity  ||  Delhi High Court: Can’t Stop Student From Entering Exam Hall Once Admit Card Issued  ||  Supreme Court Asks Medical Colleges Either to Pay Stipend or Not Have Internship    

Somnath Bhimrao Jalak vs. The State Of Maharashtra - (High Court of Bombay) (29 Jun 2022)

Dying declaration is a substantive piece of evidence, it can form the sole basis of conviction, provided it is found to be genuine and trustworthy

MANU/MH/2131/2022

Criminal

Present is an application to enlarge the applicant on bail in case registered with Indapur Police Station, District Pune, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 342 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The applicant has preferred present application for bail on the ground that the allegations of the applicant and co- accused of having abducted the deceased were found to be false by the investigation agency. In fact, a major part of the statement of the deceased was found untrue. The case set up by the prosecution on the basis of the alleged dying declaration is inherently improbable. There is no prima facie material to connect the applicant with the crime. Therefore, the applicant deserves to be released on bail.

A substantial portion of the deceased's version was not borne out by the material unearthed during the course of investigation. The witnesses simply do not state about the presence of the applicant and the co-accused at the said spot.

Undoubtedly, dying declaration is a substantive piece of evidence. It can form the sole basis of conviction, provided it is found to be genuine and trustworthy. In the case at hand, prima facie, a substantial part of the assertion in the dying declaration is rendered incorrect by the material collected by the investigating agency itself. Apart from the dying declaration, there is no other material to connect the applicant with the crime. Investigation is complete for all intent and purpose. Charge-sheet has been lodged. Further detention of the applicant does not seem to be warranted.

It is true that a couple of offences seem to have been registered against the applicant. However, the substance and nature of the accusation in the case at hand, cannot be lost sight of. Present Court, therefore, persuaded to exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and release him on bail. Application allowed.

Tags : INVESTIGATION   BAIL   GRANT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved