Del. HC: Mitsubishi Corporation Can’t Deduct TDS on The Amount Not Chargeable to Tax in India  ||  Delhi HC: Prospective Adoptive Parents Can't Demand Their Choice on Which Child to Adopt  ||  Supreme Court: Termination of Woman Nursing Officer on Grounds of Her Marriage is Unconstitutional  ||  Supreme Court: Accused Absolved of Charges Under IPC Can’t Be Charged Under UP Gangsters Act  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Judgement Released by Judge After Retirement  ||  Del. HC: Copy of Arbitration Award Must Be Given Only to The Parties And Not Their Agents/Advocates  ||  Delhi High Court: Contractual Clauses and Party’s Conduct Infer Seat of Arbitration  ||  Del HC: Party’s Agreement to Constitute Arb. Tribunal Precludes Them From Opposing Arbitrator’s App.  ||  Supreme Court: Definition of Forest Given By Godavarman Judgment Should Be Followed By States/UTs  ||  SC: Heightened Caution Must be Exercised By Police When Dispute Involves Unethical Transactions    

Madras HC: Can’t Approach HC U/A 226 if Effective And Statutory Remedy Exists Before NCLAT - (30 Jun 2022)

CONSTITUTION

Madras High Court has held that when an effective and statutory remedy lies before National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), aggrieved parties cannot invoke Article 226 of the Constitution of India for relief.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   NCLAT   MADRAS HIGH COURT   ARTICLE 226  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved