Karnataka HC: State Has Fundamental Duty to Supply Drinking Water Fit for Human Consumption  ||  Raj. HC: Can’t Extend ‘Child Specific’ Safeguards to Victim to Attaining Majority During Trial  ||  Delhi High Court: Sadhguru Seeks Protection against Infringement of his Personality Rights  ||  Delhi High Court Tells Mohak Mangal to Remove Words like ‘Gunda Raj’ from Video against ANI  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Observations on Mumbai Gateway of India Jetty Project  ||  Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over Delay by Delhi HC in Deciding Bail Plea  ||  SC Quashes Rape Case against Man Who Backed Out from Marriage  ||  Allahabad High Court Refers Question on High Court's Power to Quash FIR to 9-Judge Bench  ||  Delhi HC: Online Applications for ‘No Entry Permits’ Must be Scrutinised  ||  Delhi High Court: It is Not Necessary to Use Trademark in Physical Form    

The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Karimganj and Ors. v. The District Legal Services Authorities, Karimganj and Ors. - (High Court of Gauhati) (21 Jan 2016)

State cannot excuse itself of unemployment allowance under NREGA

MANU/GH/0030/2016

Miscellaneous

The economic capacity of the State government cannot be a factor to deny unemployment allowance to job seekers who applied under the national rural employment guarantee scheme but have been kept idle. The High Court interpreted the MGNREG Act 2005 as beneficial legislation, which made provision for payment of allowance despite job seekers not being productively employed. Moreover, the State’s financial incapacity to pay did not prevent it from being liable to pay the allowance. The Court also ruled that Lok Adalats are competent to adjudicate disputes relating to payment of unemployment allowance under the NREGA.

Relevant : "Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab MANU/SC/0025/2014 Section 9 Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005"

Tags : NREGA   UNEMPLOYMENT ALLOWANCE   FINANCIAL INCAPACITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved