SC: Section 22 of Hindu Succession Act Preference For Class-I Heirs Applies to Agricultural Land  ||  Supreme Court: Refund Clause in Sale Agreement Does Not Extinguish Right to Specific Performance  ||  SC Clarifies When a Probate Application Filed After a Testator's Death is Time-Barred  ||  Madras HC: Coordinate Bench Cannot Reopen Issue Already Settled by Another Division Bench  ||  Delhi HC Urges Law to Regulate Media, Notes Anyone with a Mobile Phone Can Claim to be a Journalist  ||  CCI Rejects Allegations of Collusion Involving Reliance Jio and More Than 4,500 Entities  ||  Allahabad HC: Working Mother with Child Custody Cannot Shift Entire Maintenance Liability to Father  ||  Bombay HC: Possessory Suit U/S 6 of the SRA is Maintainable Despite a Licensor-Licensee Relationship  ||  Del HC: Master's Candidates Without the Prescribed Bachelor's Degree are Ineligible as Govt Teacher  ||  Cal HC: BSF Cannot Deny DIG Rank to an Officer Injured in 1995 Road Accident After Earlier Promotion    

CESTAT: Statement u/s 14 of Central Excise Act has no Evidentiary Value without Cross Examination - (05 May 2022)

EXCISE

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad has observed that the statement made under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 becomes admissible evidence, when person is examined and his/her cross examination is allowed under Central Excise Act 1944.

Tags : CUSTOMS   EXCISE   EVIDENTIARY VALUE   ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved