Karnataka HC: State Has Fundamental Duty to Supply Drinking Water Fit for Human Consumption  ||  Raj. HC: Can’t Extend ‘Child Specific’ Safeguards to Victim to Attaining Majority During Trial  ||  Delhi High Court: Sadhguru Seeks Protection against Infringement of his Personality Rights  ||  Delhi High Court Tells Mohak Mangal to Remove Words like ‘Gunda Raj’ from Video against ANI  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Observations on Mumbai Gateway of India Jetty Project  ||  Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over Delay by Delhi HC in Deciding Bail Plea  ||  SC Quashes Rape Case against Man Who Backed Out from Marriage  ||  Allahabad High Court Refers Question on High Court's Power to Quash FIR to 9-Judge Bench  ||  Delhi HC: Online Applications for ‘No Entry Permits’ Must be Scrutinised  ||  Delhi High Court: It is Not Necessary to Use Trademark in Physical Form    

Arun Kumar Bajoria v. Competition Commission of India and Anr. - (High Court of Delhi) (21 Mar 2016)

HC declines interfering in CCI notice against tyre manufacturers

MRTP/ Competition Laws

A petition to halt the Competition Commission of India notice against five leading tyre companies for indulging in cartelisation in the Indian market was dismissed. CCI had previously ordered an investigation by the Director General into the conduct of the tyre manufacturers which revealed the manufacturers to have colluded in fixing the sale price of tyres. Soon after, notice was sent to the companies as well as certain individuals. The petitioner contested the notice for being premature as final determination of contravention under Section 27 of the Competition Act 2002 was not complete. The Court ruled that the matter should have been raised before the CCI itself, before the higher courts were approached.

Relevant : Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors. MANU/SC/0664/1998 Section 27 Competition Act, 2002

Tags : TYRE MANUFACTURER   CARTEL   CCI  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved