Bombay HC: Wife Humiliating Husband in Front of His Friends is Amounts to Cruelty  ||  Delhi HC Interprets Doctrine of “Compelled Self-Publication”,  ||  Del. HC Issues Summons to Campus Sutra in Trademark Infringement Suit Filed by Footwear Brand Campus  ||  Bombay HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Restraining Order against PRADA  ||  Delhi HC: Cannot Bypass Bar on Revision of Interlocutory Order by Invoking Inherent Jurisdiction  ||  Delhi HC: Prosecutrix’s Refusal to Undergo Medical Examination Weakens the Case  ||  Bom. HC: No Provision under JJ Act that Allows Adoption of a Child of Foreign Citizenship  ||  SC Passes Order to Prevent Russian Mother’s Attempt to Flee with Child  ||  SC: Deprivation of Natural Heir from Will May Not Raise Suspicion  ||  SC: Denying Female Heir Right in Property Only Exacerbates Gender Division    

Arun Kumar Bajoria v. Competition Commission of India and Anr. - (High Court of Delhi) (21 Mar 2016)

HC declines interfering in CCI notice against tyre manufacturers

MRTP/ Competition Laws

A petition to halt the Competition Commission of India notice against five leading tyre companies for indulging in cartelisation in the Indian market was dismissed. CCI had previously ordered an investigation by the Director General into the conduct of the tyre manufacturers which revealed the manufacturers to have colluded in fixing the sale price of tyres. Soon after, notice was sent to the companies as well as certain individuals. The petitioner contested the notice for being premature as final determination of contravention under Section 27 of the Competition Act 2002 was not complete. The Court ruled that the matter should have been raised before the CCI itself, before the higher courts were approached.

Relevant : Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors. MANU/SC/0664/1998 Section 27 Competition Act, 2002

Tags : TYRE MANUFACTURER   CARTEL   CCI  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved