MP HC Sets Aside Order Recognising Saif Ali Khan & Family as Heirs of Nawab of Bhopal's Properties  ||  Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Petitions Challenging Bihar Electoral Roll Revision on July 10  ||  NCLT: Dissolution under IBC Can’t Be Used to Frustrate Ongoing Criminal Prosecution under PMLA  ||  Union Government Notifies Waqf Rules 2025  ||  Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Results & Answer Key of NEET-UG 2025 Exam  ||  SC Introduces Reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in Staff Recruitments  ||  NCLAT: Restoration Application Can't Be Dismissed if Filed Within 30 Days of Dismissal of OA  ||  NCLAT: Single WhatsApp Message Sent Long Ago Can't Become Foundation to Reject Petition U/S 9 of IBC  ||  CJI Launches Live Streaming Of Bombay HC Proceedings  ||  AP HC Directs Magistrates to follow SC Guidelines Before Remanding a Person Booked For Posts    

Arun Kumar Bajoria v. Competition Commission of India and Anr. - (High Court of Delhi) (21 Mar 2016)

HC declines interfering in CCI notice against tyre manufacturers

MRTP/ Competition Laws

A petition to halt the Competition Commission of India notice against five leading tyre companies for indulging in cartelisation in the Indian market was dismissed. CCI had previously ordered an investigation by the Director General into the conduct of the tyre manufacturers which revealed the manufacturers to have colluded in fixing the sale price of tyres. Soon after, notice was sent to the companies as well as certain individuals. The petitioner contested the notice for being premature as final determination of contravention under Section 27 of the Competition Act 2002 was not complete. The Court ruled that the matter should have been raised before the CCI itself, before the higher courts were approached.

Relevant : Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors. MANU/SC/0664/1998 Section 27 Competition Act, 2002

Tags : TYRE MANUFACTURER   CARTEL   CCI  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved