Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees  ||  Supreme Court: Bureaucratic Delay No Excuse  ||  Supreme Court Grants Full Disability Pension Arrears to Veterans  ||  Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age  ||  Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage  ||  Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct  ||  Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments  ||  Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made  ||  SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams    

Arun Kumar Bajoria v. Competition Commission of India and Anr. - (High Court of Delhi) (21 Mar 2016)

HC declines interfering in CCI notice against tyre manufacturers

MRTP/ Competition Laws

A petition to halt the Competition Commission of India notice against five leading tyre companies for indulging in cartelisation in the Indian market was dismissed. CCI had previously ordered an investigation by the Director General into the conduct of the tyre manufacturers which revealed the manufacturers to have colluded in fixing the sale price of tyres. Soon after, notice was sent to the companies as well as certain individuals. The petitioner contested the notice for being premature as final determination of contravention under Section 27 of the Competition Act 2002 was not complete. The Court ruled that the matter should have been raised before the CCI itself, before the higher courts were approached.

Relevant : Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors. MANU/SC/0664/1998 Section 27 Competition Act, 2002

Tags : TYRE MANUFACTURER   CARTEL   CCI  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved