Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

Bombay HC: No Bar on Court Exercising Jurisdiction Even When Application U/S 7 of IBC is Filed - (27 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Bombay High Court has ruled that since application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed, which is pending for consideration does not expel the High Court's jurisdiction to entertain an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   SECTION 7   INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE   2016   SECTION 11   ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved