AP HC: Shutdown of Specific Unit Constitutes Closure, Workers Entitled to Compensation under S.25FFF  ||  P&H High Court: Over-Implication of Accused’s Relatives Turns Criminal Process Into Harassment  ||  Delhi HC: Denying Candidature of Physically Disabled Person Due to 'No Vacancy' Violates RPwD Act  ||  Delhi HC: Denying Candidature of Physically Disabled Person Due to 'No Vacancy' Violates RPwD Act  ||  Delhi HC: Denying Candidature of Physically Disabled Person Due to 'No Vacancy' Violates RPwD Act  ||  HP High Court: Possession of Intermediate Quantity of Opium Poppy Not Punishable under S.37 NDPS Act  ||  Delhi HC: Caste Abuse on Flyover Counts as 'Public View' Under SC/ST Act Even Without Witnesses  ||  Kerala High Court: Limitation Period Starts From Date Continuous Breach of Contract Comes to an End  ||  Delhi High Court: Renting or Leasing Residential Property for Residential Use Exempt from GST  ||  Delhi High Court: Banks Cannot Be Accused of Defamation, Calling a Company 'Fraud' Not Defamatory    

Bombay HC: No Bar on Court Exercising Jurisdiction Even When Application U/S 7 of IBC is Filed - (27 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Bombay High Court has ruled that since application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed, which is pending for consideration does not expel the High Court's jurisdiction to entertain an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   SECTION 7   INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE   2016   SECTION 11   ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved