SC: Public Premises Act Prevails over State Rent Laws For Evicting Unauthorised Occupants  ||  SC: Doctors Were Unwavering Heroes in COVID-19, and Their Sacrifice Remains Indelible  ||  SC Sets Up Secondary Medical Board to Assess Passive Euthanasia Plea of Man in Vegetative State  ||  NCLAT: Amounts Listed As ‘Other Advances’ in Company’s Balance Sheet aren’t Financial Debt under IBC  ||  NCLT Ahmedabad: Objections to Coc Cannot Bar RP From Challenging Preferential Transactions  ||  J&K&L HC: Courts Should Exercise Caution When Granting Interim Relief in Public Infrastructure Cases  ||  Bombay HC: SARFAESI Sale Invalid if Sale Certificate is Not Issued Prior to IBC Moratorium  ||  Supreme Court: Police May Freeze Bank Accounts under S.102 CrPC in Prevention of Corruption Cases  ||  SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends on Time Expiry; Substituted Arbitrator Must Continue After Extension  ||  SC: Woman May Move Her Department’s ICC For Harassment by Employee of Another Workplace    

Bombay HC: No Bar on Court Exercising Jurisdiction Even When Application U/S 7 of IBC is Filed - (27 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Bombay High Court has ruled that since application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed, which is pending for consideration does not expel the High Court's jurisdiction to entertain an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   SECTION 7   INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE   2016   SECTION 11   ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved