MP HC: Policy of First Come, First Serve is Inherently Flawed  ||  Bombay HC: Arbitration Clause Giving Unilateral Power Does Not Render the Agreement Invalid  ||  Madras HC: Taxpayer Not Responding to Notices Should be Sent Reminder through RPAD  ||  Madras HC: Taxpayer Not Responding to Notices Should be Sent Reminder through RPAD  ||  Bombay HC: There is Prohibition Only on "Talaq-e-biddat" and Not on "Talaq-e-Ahsan"  ||  Bombay HC: Government Allottee Lacking Legal Occupation Can’t be Considered ‘Deemed Tenant’  ||  AP HC: If a “Necessary Party” is Not Impleaded, the Suit Itself is Liable to be Dismissed  ||  Delhi HC: No Affect on Charitable Trust’s Status for Making Payments for Services by Related Party  ||  Bombay HC Directs State Govt. to Upload State's Prison & Police Manual on Internet  ||  Delhi HC: If Use of Smoke Cannister a Terrorist Act then Every Holi & IPL Match Will Attract UAPA    

Allahabad HC: Application for Extension of Time for Passing Award Lies Only Before High Court - (20 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Allahabad High Court has observed that the Court for the reason of an application under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would only be the High Court that appointed the arbitrator.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   SECTION 29A OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996   HIGH COURT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved