AP HC: Shutdown of Specific Unit Constitutes Closure, Workers Entitled to Compensation under S.25FFF  ||  P&H High Court: Over-Implication of Accused’s Relatives Turns Criminal Process Into Harassment  ||  Delhi HC: Denying Candidature of Physically Disabled Person Due to 'No Vacancy' Violates RPwD Act  ||  Delhi HC: Denying Candidature of Physically Disabled Person Due to 'No Vacancy' Violates RPwD Act  ||  Delhi HC: Denying Candidature of Physically Disabled Person Due to 'No Vacancy' Violates RPwD Act  ||  HP High Court: Possession of Intermediate Quantity of Opium Poppy Not Punishable under S.37 NDPS Act  ||  Delhi HC: Caste Abuse on Flyover Counts as 'Public View' Under SC/ST Act Even Without Witnesses  ||  Kerala High Court: Limitation Period Starts From Date Continuous Breach of Contract Comes to an End  ||  Delhi High Court: Renting or Leasing Residential Property for Residential Use Exempt from GST  ||  Delhi High Court: Banks Cannot Be Accused of Defamation, Calling a Company 'Fraud' Not Defamatory    

Delhi HC: Sufficiency of Stamp Duty on Agreement Cannot be Adjudicated u/s 11 of A&C Act - (14 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Delhi High Court has observed that the Court can’t adjudicate on the issue whether the claims made by the petitioner are barred by limitation while dealing with a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for referring the parties to arbitration.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   SECTION 11 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996   ARBITRATION   LIMITATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved