SC: Casual Workers Can't be Denied Regularisation if Similar Daily Wagers were Regularised  ||  Supreme Court: Illegal Change of Land Use under Punjab Act Cannot be Legalised Later  ||  Allahabad High Court: Magistrate Must Consider Closure Report Even After Taking Cognizance  ||  Allahabad HC: CGST Arrest Memo Must Include Grounds as Annexure; Reasons to Believe Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC: Petitioner’s Identity Must be Verified Via SHO in Cases of Bank Account Defreezing  ||  J&K&L HC: Undenied Pleadings are Deemed Admitted by Implication under the CPC  ||  Kerala HC: Transfer Order Pending Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot be Disguised as Punishment  ||  Allahabad HC: GST, Incentives, 0r Festival Advances Cannot be Deducted From Employee’s Retiral Dues  ||  SC: Absconding Accused Cannot Claim Anticipatory Bail Solely Because a Co-Accused Was Acquitted  ||  Supreme Court: District Cricket Bodies Must Adopt Good Governance Voluntarily, Not Follow BCCI Rules    

Delhi HC: Sufficiency of Stamp Duty on Agreement Cannot be Adjudicated u/s 11 of A&C Act - (14 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Delhi High Court has observed that the Court can’t adjudicate on the issue whether the claims made by the petitioner are barred by limitation while dealing with a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for referring the parties to arbitration.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   SECTION 11 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996   ARBITRATION   LIMITATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved