SC: ‘Abandonment of Service is Not Voluntary Retirement’, Denying SBI Clerk Pension Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Stranger Affected by an Interim Order is Entitled to be Impleaded in Writ Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Replace an Authority’s Discretion, and Sets Aside Direction to Governor  ||  SC: Title Suit Hit by Constructive Res Judicata if Omitted in Prior Injunction Suit Disputing Title  ||  SC Clarifies Whether a Co-Operative Society Can Act as a Resolution Applicant under the IBC  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: Innocent Litigants Should Not be Penalized For Lapses by Their Lawyers  ||  Delhi High Court: Marriage With the Victim Cannot Absolve an Accused of Rape under POCSO  ||  J&K&L HC: Acquisition Lapses if 80% Compensation is Unpaid Before Possession under Section 17A  ||  Delhi HC: Policy Number is Not Mandatory For LIC Details under RTI, But Basic Details are Required  ||  SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law    

ITAT, Delhi Deletes Penalty Against Lahmeyer Holding GambH - (12 Apr 2022)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal , Delhi has granted relief to Lahmeyer holding that the penalty cannot be levied based on fact that the assessee under section 44BBB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 opted to compute income under a bonafide belief that they don’t have a permanent establishment in India.

Tags : INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   LAHMEYER HOLDING GAMBH   SECTION 44BBB OF THE INCOME TAX ACT   1961   PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT   BONAFIDE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved