Supreme Court: Permanent Alimony Should not Penalize the Husband  ||  SC Reserves Judgement on Plea by Transwoman Whose Appointment was Cancelled on Gender Identity  ||  Lok Sabha Introduces the Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024  ||  NCLAT: If Liquidation Cost Not Paid as Per Regulations, Security Interest Shall Stand Relinquished  ||  SC Refers to Larger Bench Conflicting Interpretation Surrounding Sections 14(1) & 14(2) of HSA  ||  Supreme Court: There Has Been a Growing Tendency to Misuse Section 498A of IPC by Wife  ||  Inordinate Delay in Execution of Death Sentence has a Dehumanising Effect on Accused  ||  PC Granted to Woman Army Officer Who Was Denied Benefits Given to Similarly Situated Others  ||  If Bodily Injury Caused with Lethal Weapon, Lack of Intention to Cause Murder Irrelevant  ||  Must AddSection 304(II) of IPC In Accidents Involving Drunk Drivers    

ITAT, Delhi Deletes Penalty Against Lahmeyer Holding GambH - (12 Apr 2022)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal , Delhi has granted relief to Lahmeyer holding that the penalty cannot be levied based on fact that the assessee under section 44BBB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 opted to compute income under a bonafide belief that they don’t have a permanent establishment in India.

Tags : INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   LAHMEYER HOLDING GAMBH   SECTION 44BBB OF THE INCOME TAX ACT   1961   PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT   BONAFIDE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved