Supreme Court: Vacancies From Resignations under CUSAT Act Must Follow Communal Rotation  ||  Supreme Court: Forest Land Cannot Be Leased or Used For Agriculture Without Centre’s Approval  ||  Supreme Court: Gravity of Offence and Accused’s Role Must Guide Suspension of Sentence under CrPC  ||  Supreme Court: Arbitral Awards Cannot be Set Aside For Mere Legal Errors or Misreading of Evidence  ||  SC Acknowledges Child Trafficking as a Grave Reality and Issues Guidelines to Assess Victim Evidence  ||  Allahabad HC: When Parties Extend an Agreement by Conduct, The Arbitration Clause Extends Too  ||  Supreme Court: Issues of Party Capacity and Maintainability Must Be Decided by Arbitral Tribunal  ||  Supreme Court: Omissions in Chief Examination Can Be Rectified During Cross-Examination  ||  Supreme Court: Items Given by Accused to Police Are Not Section 27 Recoveries under Evidence Act  ||  Gujarat High Court: Waqf Institutions Must Pay Court Fees When Filing Disputes in State Tribunal    

ITAT, Delhi Deletes Penalty Against Lahmeyer Holding GambH - (12 Apr 2022)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal , Delhi has granted relief to Lahmeyer holding that the penalty cannot be levied based on fact that the assessee under section 44BBB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 opted to compute income under a bonafide belief that they don’t have a permanent establishment in India.

Tags : INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   LAHMEYER HOLDING GAMBH   SECTION 44BBB OF THE INCOME TAX ACT   1961   PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT   BONAFIDE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved