NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

ITAT, Delhi Deletes Penalty Against Lahmeyer Holding GambH - (12 Apr 2022)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal , Delhi has granted relief to Lahmeyer holding that the penalty cannot be levied based on fact that the assessee under section 44BBB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 opted to compute income under a bonafide belief that they don’t have a permanent establishment in India.

Tags : INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   LAHMEYER HOLDING GAMBH   SECTION 44BBB OF THE INCOME TAX ACT   1961   PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT   BONAFIDE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved