Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home  ||  Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing  ||  Delhi HC: ECI Cannot Resolve Internal Disputes of Unrecognised Parties; Civil Court Must Decide  ||  Bombay High Court: Senior Citizens Act Cannot be Misused to Summarily Evict a Son  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Service Tax Refund Can't Be Denied on Limitation When Payment Was Made During Probe  ||  Supreme Court: If Tribunal Ends Case For Unpaid Fees, Parties Must Seek Recall Before Using S.14(2)  ||  SC: Article 226 Writs Jurisdiction Cannot be Used to Challenge Economic or Fiscal Reforms  ||  Supreme Court: Hostile Witness Testimony Can't Be Discarded; Consistent Parts Remain Valid  ||  Supreme Court: GPF Nomination in Favour of a Parent Becomes Invalid Once the Employee Marries  ||  Supreme Court: Candidate Not Disqualified if Core Subject Studied Without Exact Degree Title    

CESTAT, Bangalore Quashes Demand of Service Tax for Promotion of IPL Team - (06 Apr 2022)

SERVICE TAX

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore has held that the promotional activities by Anil Kumblein, former Indian skipper to carry advertising, promotional activity, team endorsement shall not be treated as Business Auxilliary Services and no service tax can be imposed on the same.

Tags : CUSTOMS   EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES   ANIL KUMBLEIN   ADVERTISING   BUSINESS AUXILLIARY SERVICES   NO SERVICE TAX  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved