Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report  ||  MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC  ||  Delhi HC: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 as They Do Not Perform Public Functions  ||  Delhi HC: Pending Probate Proceedings Do Not Prevent Filing FIR For Alleged Will Forgery  ||  Ker HC: Dismissal For Default Alone Cannot Justify Rejecting Restoration Plea For Lack of Vigilance  ||  SC: Disclosure Statements Alone Cannot Secure Conviction Without a Complete Chain of Evidence  ||  Supreme Court Orders Reporting of Student Suicides and Bans Denial of Classes or Exams  ||  SC: Govt Can Exclude Overqualified Candidates From Posts Requiring Lower Qualifications  ||  SC: Contracts to Hire Global Speakers For Media Summits are Not Taxable as Event Management Services  ||  SC: Mandatory Injunction Suit Alone is Not Maintainable When Plaintiff’s Title is Disputed    

CESTAT, Bangalore Quashes Demand of Service Tax for Promotion of IPL Team - (06 Apr 2022)

SERVICE TAX

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore has held that the promotional activities by Anil Kumblein, former Indian skipper to carry advertising, promotional activity, team endorsement shall not be treated as Business Auxilliary Services and no service tax can be imposed on the same.

Tags : CUSTOMS   EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES   ANIL KUMBLEIN   ADVERTISING   BUSINESS AUXILLIARY SERVICES   NO SERVICE TAX  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved