Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists  ||  Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness  ||  Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment  ||  Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met  ||  Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC  ||  Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable  ||  SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved    

CESTAT, Bangalore Quashes Demand of Service Tax for Promotion of IPL Team - (06 Apr 2022)

SERVICE TAX

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore has held that the promotional activities by Anil Kumblein, former Indian skipper to carry advertising, promotional activity, team endorsement shall not be treated as Business Auxilliary Services and no service tax can be imposed on the same.

Tags : CUSTOMS   EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES   ANIL KUMBLEIN   ADVERTISING   BUSINESS AUXILLIARY SERVICES   NO SERVICE TAX  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved