Del. HC Stresses Mandatory Legal Assistance to Preserve Fairness and Integrity of Criminal Trials  ||  Supreme Court: Delhi High Court Ruling upheld on Taekwondo National Sports Federation Recognition  ||  SC: Blockchain-Based Digitisation of Land Records Necessary to Reduce Property Document Litigation  ||  Supreme Court to NCLT : Limit Power to Decide Intellectual Property Title Disputes under IBC  ||  Bombay HC: Railway Employee With Valid Privilege Pass is Bona Fide Passenger Despite Missing Entries  ||  Delhi High Court: Mere Pleadings Made To Prosecute or Defend a Case Do Not Amount To Defamation  ||  Delhi High Court: Asking an Accused To Cross-Examine a Witness Without Legal Aid Vitiates The Trial  ||  Delhi High Court: Recruitment Notice Error Creates No Appointment Right Without Vacancy  ||  Supreme Court: Subordinate Legislation Takes Effect Only From its Publication in The Official Gazette  ||  Supreme Court: DDA Must Adopt a Litigation Policy To Screen Cases and Avoid Unnecessary Filings    

Why drugs are being taken off pharmacy shelves - (21 Mar 2016)

Civil

Headlines in recent days and weeks have reported hundreds, even thousands of drugs being banned from sale in India. Pharmacists are warning of shortages, a kinder way of saying rising prices, while also informing the Drug Controller General of India of the heightening probability of closure of shops, a.k.a., a strike. But why the sudden onset hostility towards certain medicines?

The banning of drugs may seem to have sprung out of the blue but there is method in the pharmacophobia. Circa June of 2013, the Directorate General of Health Services, under the auspices of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, released a report, ‘Policy Guidelines for Approval of Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs) in India’. Prepared under the aegis of Professor C.K. Kokate, the Report considered the prevalence of ‘Fixed Dose Combination’, drugs comprising two or more active ingredients in a fixed ratio. The rationale behind FDCs is simple: two or more ‘actives’ that complement each other or provide the benefit of two products in one swallowing. But, to ensure FDCs’ benefits outweighing their risks, the Report called for called such preparations being based on “convincing therapeutic rationalization and be carefully justified and clinically relevant.” Categories of FDCs were penned and the onus was on manufacturers to show the rationale behind having two or more active ingredients in one preparation.

The Report birthed the ‘Kokate Committee’: tasked with the implementation of recommendations in the report, the Committee has spent over one year perusing thousands of drugs. As of January 2015, the Committee had found only 42.07 per cent of FDCs submitted for perusal as rational, and over 30 per cent as requiring further data or deliberation.

Tags : MINISTRY OF HEALTH   FIXED DOSE COMBINATIONS   RATIONALE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved