Rajya Sabha Passes the ‘Bharatiya Vayuyan Vidheyak, 2024’  ||  Del. HC: It’s a Disturbing Trend of Exploiting Social Media Platforms for Committing Sexual Offences  ||  Ori HC: State Can’t Question Maintain. of Suit for No Notice at Stage of Appeal if Not Done in WS  ||  Ker. HC: Can’t Call Putting Up Boards of Temples, Mosques on Busy Roads as Religious Practice  ||  P&H HC: If People are Allowed to Stay All Night at Bars and Pubs, it will Hamper Indian Society  ||  SC: NCR States to Ask Workers to Register Themselves on Portal for Receiving Subsistence Allowance  ||  Rajya Sabha Passes the Boilers Bill, 2024  ||  NCLAT: Authority Can’t Pass Adverse Remarks against RP Performing Duties as Per CoC’s Instruction  ||  Tel. HC: Teacher Eligibility Test Guidelines Framed to Ensure that Competent Persons are Recruited  ||  Ker. HC: Loss in Derivative Business Would be a Business Loss for Purposes of Section 72 of IT Act    

Calcutta HC: Discretionary Scope to Stay Award u/s 19 MSME Act Wider Than u/s 36(3) Arbitration Act - (30 Mar 2022)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has held that the scope of discretion upon a Court to stay an award or a decree under Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSME Act) is wider in comparison to Section 36(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) where the discretion is restricted to granting stay of an award subject to appropriate conditions.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996   SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES DEVELOPMENT ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved