Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists  ||  Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness  ||  Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment  ||  Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met  ||  Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC  ||  Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable  ||  SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved    

Bombay HC: Threshold of Public Interest Must to Stop Bypassing of Civil Courts - (29 Mar 2022)

CONTRACT

Bombay High Court has held that a writ Court should not exercise its powers in contractual matters under Article 226 of the Constitution, unless the same is useful in public interest. The court observed that that the power of judicial review should not be invoked in contractual disputes to protect private interest at the cost of public interest or to settle on contractual disputes.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   PUBLIC INTEREST   CIVIL COURT   JUDICIAL REVIEW   CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved