SC Cancels Chhota Rajan's Bail in 2001 Jaya Shetty Murder Case  ||  NCLAT: Workmen Can Claim Dues Post-Layoff If They Worked After Corporate Debtor's Notice Issuance  ||  NCLAT: Debt Can be Proved Through Any Documentary Evidence, No Written Contract Needed.  ||  Madras HC: Railway Authorities Can't Deboard Valid-Ticket Passengers Heading to Protest  ||  Delhi HC: Women’s Entry into Army Corps Can’t be Restricted; Vacant Male Posts Must be Open to Women  ||  Delhi HC: Pressuring Husband to Cut Ties With His Family Amounts to Cruelty; Ground For Divorce  ||  Bombay HC: Magistrate Need Not Pass Preliminary Order U/S 145 CrOC If HC or SC Directs Inquiry  ||  Delhi HC Allows Woman to Terminate 22-Week Pregnancy from False Promise of Marriage  ||  Supreme Court: Reasons Omitted In an Order May be Considered In Specific Circumstances  ||  SC: Execution of Arbitral Award Cannot be Stalled Just Because Section 37 Appeal is Pending    

Oasis Textiles Limited vs. The DCIT - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (25 Mar 2022)

Once a company is dissolved, it becomes a non-existent party and therefore, no action can be brought in its name

MANU/IB/0130/2022

Direct Taxation

The assessee-company was trading in shares. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment and notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) was issued and served upon the assessee. Ultimately, the assessment was concluded by the AO by making addition of Rs.1,13,65,136 under Section 68 of the IT Act on account of unexplained cash and unexplained income, and assessment order under section 143(3) of the IT Act was accordingly passed. Thereafter, the addition was confirmed by the learned CIT(A) by order. Against the confirmation of addition, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

On completion of liquidation process, assessee- company was dissolved by the NCLT vide order dated 30.6.2020. The claim of the Department was prior to the date of Resolution Plan approved by the NCLT, and therefore, the present income tax proceedings is hit by section 31(1) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which has overriding effect vis-à-vis the Income Tax Act, 1961. All these events are within the knowledge of the Income Tax Department, as the OL of assessee-company has intimated the Department from time to time in writing, but no action has been taken by the Department.

Once a company is dissolved, it becomes a non-existent party and therefore no action can be brought in its name. Therefore, in view of overriding effect of IBC code to the Income Tax proceeding, Revenue is not entitled to recover the claim, if any arising from the present proceedings for Assessment year 2015-16, as the same is not part of the resolution plan. The entire proceedings including the appeal have become infructuous and the same is liable to dismissed as infructuous.

Tags : ASSESSMENT   ADDITIONS   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved