SC: Absence of Independent Witnesses is Not Fatal if Injured Eyewitness Testimony is Sterling || Supreme Court: Prosthetic Limb Costs Must Be Compensated To Restore Victims’ Dignity || Supreme Court: Probate Can be Revoked For Non-Impleadment of Parties and Suppression of Facts || SC: Plaint Cannot be Rejected For Valuation or Court Fee Defects Without Chance to Rectify || SC Rules Government Grants Act Overrides Rent Law, Sets Aside Eviction Proceeding Against Union Govt || SC: Civil Court Has No Jurisdiction in Boundary Dispute Between Maharashtra Panchayat & Municipality || Allahabad HC: Two Criminal Cases Insufficient to Label a Person as 'Goonda' and Harm Reputation || Bom HC: Sprinkling Mustard Without Ill Intent Before a House is Not an Offence under Black Magic Act || J&K&L HC: Preventive Detention Invalid When Based on Speculative Fear of Election Disturbance || Bombay High Court: POSH Act Penalises False Complaints by Women But Not Those Who Instigate Them

Clarification regarding co-noticees under Section 28 Customs Act 1962- (Ministry of Finance ) (15 Mar 2016)

MANU/CUCR/0011/2016

Customs

The Central Board of Excise and Customs issued clarification regarding ‘other persons’ under Section 28(2) and 28(6)(i) of the Customs Act 1962. Provision of deemed conclusion of proceedings introduced into Section 28 of the Act was to bring about closure of cases where dues to the Government could be realized without an adjudicatory process and also to reduce protracted litigation which follows.

Deemed conclusion is contingent upon the person to whom a show cause notice is issued for payment of duty dues, interest and penalty. Upon compliance with the same, proceedings against ‘other persons’ will also conclude.

Tags : CUSTOMS DEEMED CONCLUSION OTHER PERSONS

Share :