NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports || Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC || SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation || SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job || NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights || NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation || Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation || Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute' || Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices || Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear

Clarification regarding co-noticees under Section 28 Customs Act 1962- (Ministry of Finance ) (15 Mar 2016)

MANU/CUCR/0011/2016

Customs

The Central Board of Excise and Customs issued clarification regarding ‘other persons’ under Section 28(2) and 28(6)(i) of the Customs Act 1962. Provision of deemed conclusion of proceedings introduced into Section 28 of the Act was to bring about closure of cases where dues to the Government could be realized without an adjudicatory process and also to reduce protracted litigation which follows.

Deemed conclusion is contingent upon the person to whom a show cause notice is issued for payment of duty dues, interest and penalty. Upon compliance with the same, proceedings against ‘other persons’ will also conclude.

Tags : CUSTOMS DEEMED CONCLUSION OTHER PERSONS

Share :