P&H High Court: Re-Investigation Cannot Nullify Existing Acquittal Despite Breach of Stay Order  ||  Gujarat HC: Illegal Mining Vehicle Complaints Must Be Filed Before Sessions Court, Not Magistrate  ||  Delhi High Court Lays Down Registry Directions for Dealing with Insufficiently Stamped Arbitral Award  ||  Delhi High Court: Victims Need No Leave to Appeal Acquittal or Conviction for Lesser Offence  ||  SC: Limitation Act Inapplicable to Revisions under Karnataka Land Revenue Act  ||  SC: Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI for Loans Acquired from NBFCs Outside the Act  ||  SC: Gujarat Prohibition Act Does not Bar Interim Seized Vehicle Release  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rs. 425-Crore Customs Penalty Based on AI-Generated Fake Case Laws  ||  SC: Guilt cannot be Presumed Solely Due to Collusion Allegations against Investigating Officer  ||  SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings    

Clarification regarding co-noticees under Section 28 Customs Act 1962- (Ministry of Finance ) (15 Mar 2016)

MANU/CUCR/0011/2016

Customs

The Central Board of Excise and Customs issued clarification regarding ‘other persons’ under Section 28(2) and 28(6)(i) of the Customs Act 1962. Provision of deemed conclusion of proceedings introduced into Section 28 of the Act was to bring about closure of cases where dues to the Government could be realized without an adjudicatory process and also to reduce protracted litigation which follows.

Deemed conclusion is contingent upon the person to whom a show cause notice is issued for payment of duty dues, interest and penalty. Upon compliance with the same, proceedings against ‘other persons’ will also conclude.

Tags : CUSTOMS   DEEMED CONCLUSION   OTHER PERSONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved