Rajasthan High Court: No Law for Conducting Arrest through Video Calls  ||  Gauhati HC Stays Operation of Two Amendments to the Nagaland Lokayukta Act  ||  Mad. HC: “Sexual Harassment” as Seen from PoSH Act Gives Significance to the Act than the Intention  ||  Del. HC: Restriction u/s 37 of NDPS Act Cannot take Precedence Over Accused’s Right u/a 21  ||  Ker. HC: Creating Geographical Restriction for an Escort Visit Can’t be Considered Violation of FRs  ||  Bom. HC: Can Proceed with Trial if Accused Neither Appears Nor Seeks Exemption from Attendance  ||  Bom. HC: Cannot Breach Fundamental Rights of Residents Merely because they Feed Dogs  ||  Del. HC: While Calculating Compensation, Family Pension Paid to Deceased’s Family Cannot be Deducted  ||  Del. HC: Department Can't Hold Compliance once Court Orders Release of Bank Guarantee by Trader  ||  Allahabad HC: Cannot Claim Use of Loudspeakers as a Matter of Right    

Final findings-sunset review investigation concerning imports of wire rod of alloy or non-alloy steel- (Ministry of Commerce and Industry) (07 Feb 2022)

MANU/COMM/0016/2022

Commercial

1. The undersigned is directed to refer to final findings on the above subject issued vide notification F. No. 7/17/2021-DGTR, dated the 28th October, 2021, wherein it was recommended to impose definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of "Wire rod of alloy or nonalloy steel", originating in or exported from China PR.

2. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, read with rules 18 and 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government, after considering the aforesaid final findings of the designated authority, has decided not to accept the aforesaid recommendations.

Tags : FINAL FINDINGS   SUNSET REVIEW   IMPORTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved