Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases  ||  SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants  ||  Delhi HC: Minimum Wages During Pending Litigation Cannot be Frozen and Must be Updated Periodically  ||  Kerala HC: ICC Can Probe Sexual Harassment Complaint Against a Director Not Controlling Affairs  ||  Delhi HC: Interim Protection From Blacklisting Does Not Remove Bidder’s Duty to Disclose in Tenders  ||  Allahabad HC: After the BNSS, Pre-Cognizance Hearing of the Accused is Mandatory in NDPS Complaints  ||  Delhi HC: Husband Cannot Avoid Maintenance For Wife and Children by Claiming Irregular Income  ||  SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law    

Messer Greisheim Gmbh (Now Called Air Liquide Deutschloand Gmbh) Vs. Goyal Mg Gases Private Limited - (Supreme Court) (28 Jan 2022)

High Court having an ordinary original civil jurisdiction can also execute foreign decree under Section 44A of CPC

MANU/SC/0102/2022

Civil

The Appellant/decree holder has challenged the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court relegating to file a petition for execution of a money decree dated 7th February, 2006(in excess of Rs. 20 lakhs) of a foreign Court before the District Court in view of Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(“CPC”).

The question that emerges for consideration is whether the High Court of Delhi in exercise of its original jurisdiction is a competent Court to entertain a petition for executing a money decree (in excess of Rs.20 lakhs) of a foreign Court which is notified as a superior Court of reciprocating territory under Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Section 44A of the CPC provides for execution of decrees passed by the foreign Courts in reciprocating territories. It stipulates that, where a certified copy of a decree of any of the superior Court of any reciprocating territory has been filed in a District Court, the decree may be executed in India as if it had been passed by a District Court. As per Section 2(4) of the CPC, “district” means the local limits of the jurisdiction of a principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction (“District Court”), and includes the local limits of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of a High Court.

The ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Court is always exercised, based on pecuniary limits. Once the pecuniary jurisdiction at the given point of time exceeded Rs. 20 lakhs as notified by the High Court under Section 5(2) of the Act 1966 (later vide notification dated 10th August, 2015 (w.e.f. 26th October, 2015) pecuniary limits has been revised to Rs. 2 crores), it is the High Court of Delhi which holds its exclusive jurisdiction as ordinary original civil jurisdiction to execute a foreign decree under Section 44A of the CPC and it goes without saying that execution always is in continuation of the proceedings.

Once the pecuniary jurisdiction exceeds as being notified under the relevant statute, the jurisdiction vests exclusively with the High Court as an ordinary original civil jurisdiction for execution of a foreign decree under Section 44A subject to the just objections which are available to the parties/judgment debtor as envisaged under Section 13 of the CPC. The judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court is set aside. Appeal allowed.

Tags : JURISDICTION   EXECUTION   FOREIGN DECREES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved