Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists || Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness || Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment || Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met || Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC || Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable || SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions || SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute || SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending || SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved

Clarifications on levy imposed on jewellery - (04 Mar 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0299/2016

Excise

The government issued clarifications on the excise duty of one per cent (without input tax credit) and 12.5 per cent (with input tax credit) levied on jewellery manufacture. Compliance with the duty can be completed online, with no interaction with Department officers, and central excise officers have been directed to not visit premises of jewellery manufacturers. Artisans or goldsmiths manufacturing jewellery on job-work are not required to register with the Department or file returns. With the limits set, only jewelers with a turnover greater than Rs. 12 crore will be liable to pay excise duty.

Tags : CENTRAL EXCISE JEWELLERY CLARIFICATION

Share :