Supreme Court: Confession Without Corroboration Cannot Form the Basis of Conviction || SC: Higher Land Acquisition Compensation to Some Owners Cannot Invalidate Awards to Others || SC: Prior Written Demand is Not Mandatory For an Industrial Dispute to Exist or be Referred || SC: Complaint U/S 175(4) BNSS Against a Public Servant Must Meet the Conditions of Section 175(3) || P&H HC: Customary Restrictions Can't Stop Widow From Alienating Non-Ancestral Property || Delhi High Court: SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Directive on Written Arrest Grounds Applies Prospectively || MP HC: MPPSC Cannot Reject Doctors For PG Additional Registration Not Mentioned in the Advertisement || Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Carries Strong Presumption of Genuineness || SC: Registry Cannot Intrude Into Judiciary’s Exclusive Domain By Questioning Why a Party is Impleaded || Calcutta HC: Third-Party Suits in a Deity’s Name are Allowed Only When The Sebait Loses Authority

Clarifications on levy imposed on jewellery - (04 Mar 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0299/2016

Excise

The government issued clarifications on the excise duty of one per cent (without input tax credit) and 12.5 per cent (with input tax credit) levied on jewellery manufacture. Compliance with the duty can be completed online, with no interaction with Department officers, and central excise officers have been directed to not visit premises of jewellery manufacturers. Artisans or goldsmiths manufacturing jewellery on job-work are not required to register with the Department or file returns. With the limits set, only jewelers with a turnover greater than Rs. 12 crore will be liable to pay excise duty.

Tags : CENTRAL EXCISE JEWELLERY CLARIFICATION

Share :