Bombay HC: Railway Employee With Valid Privilege Pass is Bona Fide Passenger Despite Missing Entries || Delhi High Court: Mere Pleadings Made To Prosecute or Defend a Case Do Not Amount To Defamation || Delhi High Court: Asking an Accused To Cross-Examine a Witness Without Legal Aid Vitiates The Trial || Delhi High Court: Recruitment Notice Error Creates No Appointment Right Without Vacancy || Supreme Court: Subordinate Legislation Takes Effect Only From its Publication in The Official Gazette || Supreme Court: DDA Must Adopt a Litigation Policy To Screen Cases and Avoid Unnecessary Filings || Authorities Holding Public Auctions Must Disclose All Known Encumbrances and Related Litigation || SC: Compensatory Allowances Must Be Included While Computing Overtime Wages U/S 59 of Factories Act || SC: NGT Has No Jurisdiction to Decide Disputes Relating to Building Plan Violations || SC: Evidence is Often Fabricated Using AI And False Allegations are Rampant in Matrimonial Cases

Clarifications on levy imposed on jewellery - (04 Mar 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0299/2016

Excise

The government issued clarifications on the excise duty of one per cent (without input tax credit) and 12.5 per cent (with input tax credit) levied on jewellery manufacture. Compliance with the duty can be completed online, with no interaction with Department officers, and central excise officers have been directed to not visit premises of jewellery manufacturers. Artisans or goldsmiths manufacturing jewellery on job-work are not required to register with the Department or file returns. With the limits set, only jewelers with a turnover greater than Rs. 12 crore will be liable to pay excise duty.

Tags : CENTRAL EXCISE JEWELLERY CLARIFICATION

Share :