Cal HC: Penalty Amount on Higher Value than Invoice Value Can’t be Computed by GST Dep. w/o Evidence || All. HC: Candidates with Criminal Background Will Pose Severe Threat to Democracy if Elected || All. HC: It’s an Obligation of Bank Officials to Fully Co-operate in Criminal Investigations || SC: Prima Facie Case Made Out from Allegations in Complaint Sufficient to Summon Accused || Supreme Court Explains: Debt Becoming Financial & Operational Debt || P&H HC: Model Code of Conduct Can’t Stand in Way of Execution of Judicial Order || Chh. HC: Can’t Build Matrimonial Home With Bricks & Stones, Love & Respect Between Spouses Required || Ker. HC: Fitting of Sensors in Buses Used as Stage Carriages Can’t be Insisted by Registration Author || Kar. HC: Can’t Consider Party’s Declaration, Promise of Policies as Corrupt Practise under RP Act || Bom. HC: Public Sector Banks Not Empowered to Issue Look Out Circulars Against Loan Defaulters

Clarifications on levy imposed on jewellery - (04 Mar 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0299/2016

Excise

The government issued clarifications on the excise duty of one per cent (without input tax credit) and 12.5 per cent (with input tax credit) levied on jewellery manufacture. Compliance with the duty can be completed online, with no interaction with Department officers, and central excise officers have been directed to not visit premises of jewellery manufacturers. Artisans or goldsmiths manufacturing jewellery on job-work are not required to register with the Department or file returns. With the limits set, only jewelers with a turnover greater than Rs. 12 crore will be liable to pay excise duty.

Tags : CENTRAL EXCISE JEWELLERY CLARIFICATION

Share :