Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

CESTAT, Ahmedabad Directs Revenue to Re-Consider Refund Claim of IOCL - (23 Nov 2021)

CUSTOMS

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad has given relief to Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) directing the Revenue to re-consider their claim of refund by granting an opportunity to the appellants to pursue their claim by rectifying the errors in the assessment under section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Tags : CUSTOMS   EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved