Supreme Court: GPF Nomination in Favour of a Parent Becomes Invalid Once the Employee Marries  ||  Supreme Court: Candidate Not Disqualified if Core Subject Studied Without Exact Degree Title  ||  Supreme Court: Stamp Duty Relief for Co-Operative Societies Cannot Depend on Extra-Legal Verification  ||  Delhi High Court: Allegations of Forgery Alone Do not Bar NCLT From Examining Company Records  ||  J&K&L HC: Only Revenue Authorities Can Handle Agrarian Resumption; Civil Courts Cannot Intervene  ||  Delhi HC: CAPF Candidate's Height of 164.6 Cm Can be Rounded to 165 Cm; Rejection Prima Facie Illegal  ||  NCLT Mumbai: Bank Cannot Retain OTS Earnest Money After Accepting a Resolution Plan  ||  Supreme Court: Imminent Death Not Required For a Statement to Qualify as Dying Declaration  ||  SC: HC Cannot Grant Pre-Arrest Bail Without Quashing FIR; Accused Must Approach Sessions Court First  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract    

Central Bureau of Investigation, Bank Securities & Fraud Cell v. Ramesh Gelli and Others - (23 Feb 2016)

Officers of private bank punishable under POCA

Criminal

Officers of a private bank, specifically its Chairman, Directors and other Officers are ‘public servants’ who can be prosecuted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the Supreme Court held. In a case that harkened to Bollywood movies of the 1970s, “where are my Diamonds?”, the instant case, though unlikely to have involved the blackest of stones, was predicated upon clandestine transfer of funds by ‘banking’ proprietors for wrongful gain by cheating.

Justice Pant took a direct view of the matter, equating ‘public servants’ under Section 2 of POCA and Section 46A of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949 as one and the same. Such was his opinion that though bank officials were not public servants under the Section 21 of the IPC, the same did not preclude them from prosecution under POCA by virtue of Section 46A of the Act of 1949.

Justice Gogoi cautioned against too wide an interpretation of the “public duty” under POCA, to the extent the same could encompass any duty attached to any office as having a bearing on public interest. Instead, his divergent reasoning, yet similar conclusion, looked to the relevant office and duties performed having a public character.

Relevant : Section 2 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949

Tags : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION   BANKERS   PUBLIC DUTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved