Allahabad HC Reduces Cop's Sentence in 1984 Attempt-to-Murder Case, Awards Rs. 35,000 to Victim  ||  Delhi High Court: Copyright Owners and ISPs Cannot Unilaterally Declare a Website 'Rogue'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Teacher's Reprimand for Poor Attendance and Performance is Not Abetment of Suicide  ||  Karnataka High Court: Police Assistance to Enforce Injunction Not Barred by Res Judicata  ||  SC Upholds Validity of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, Says ITC Depends on Supplier's Tax Payment  ||  Supreme Court: Registration Certificate Alone Can't Secure Interim Release of Seized Vehicles  ||  Supreme Court: IBC Moratorium Doesn't Shield Promoters, Directors From Consumer Complaints  ||  Supreme Court: Accused Person's Advocate Cannot Remain Present During Entire Police Interrogation  ||  Uttarakhand HC: Severity of POCSO Charges Alone Cannot Deny Juvenile Bail  ||  Madras HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Man Accused of Watching CM Vijay's Unreleased Film Online    

Central Board of Film Certification and Ors. v. Pankaj Butalia and Ors. - (High Court of Delhi) (15 Feb 2016)

Personal views in interview on ‘sensitive’ Kashmir to not be censored

MANU/DE/0346/2016

Media and Communication

The Delhi High Court rejected calls from the CBFC against the grant of a ‘U’ certificate to a documentary about the suffering caused by the long term violence in Kashmir. The CBFC had directed four excisions from the documentary titled ‘The Texture of Loss’; additionally a disclaimer was to be added stating that the views in the film did not intend hurt to caste, religion or society. Two scenes sought deletion of the expression “disproportionate violence” and a statement by a family damning India after the loss of their son in military action. The Court agreed that violence in Kashmir remains a sensitive topic, however material in the film was not objectionable. Statements made during interviews were personal views which could not have a demoralizing effect on security forces nor could they be termed anti-national.

Relevant : S. Rangarajan vs. P. Jagjevan Ram and Ors. MANU/SC/0475/1989 Section 5A Cinematograph Act, 1952

Tags : DOCUMENTARY   OBJECTIONABLE COMMENTS   SENSITIVE TOPIC   PERSONAL VIEW  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved