Cal HC: Death to be Presumed of Employee Untraceable for 7 Years, Heirs Entitled to Terminal Benefit  ||  Bom. HC: One-Week Bail Granted to Life Convict to Appear in Entrance Test  ||  Delhi High Court: Victim Cannot Seek Right to be Impleaded in Criminal Revision  ||  All. HC: Extension of Limitation Under A&C Act Can’t be Sought if Party Aware of Contents of Award  ||  Delhi High Court: Material on Which Prosecution Bases its Case Cannot be Disclosed in Parts  ||  Del. HC: Requisite Documents Forming Basis of Show Cause Notice Must be Provided to the Party  ||  Delhi HC: Sensitization of Trial Court Judges Required in Pronouncing Judgements on Conviction  ||  Uttarakhand High Court’s Order for its Relocation Outside Nainital, Stayed by Supreme Court  ||  Suo Motu Cognizance Taken by Gujarat High Court of Fire Accident at TRP Gaming Zone in Rajkot  ||  Ker. HC: Can’t Recall Child Witness to Fill Up Lacuna and Omission in Evidence of Accused    

Sanjib Kumar Das Vs. The Durgapur Projects Limited and Ors. - (High Court of Calcutta) (21 Jun 2021)

An employee has a right to claim interest on delayed payment of retirement benefits

MANU/WB/0412/2021

Service

The writ Petitioner joined Durgapur Projects Limited, a Government of West Bengal Enterprise, on August 18, 1980. Durgapur Projects Limited is a State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950. The Petitioner has alleged that, the delay on the part of the employer in paying the retirement benefits along with leave encashment, etc. entitles the Petitioner to claim interest on all retiral benefits on account of delayed payment.

The Petitioner retired from service on January 31, 2019. The gratuity and leave encashment were released on August 13, 2020. The Petitioner made a representation for payment of interest on account of such delayed payment. The representation of the Petitioner was not responded to. Aggrieved, the Petitioner has moved present Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and prayed for interest on delayed payment of gratuity and leave encashment.

The Hon'ble Apex Court has already held in S.K. Dua vs. State of Haryana and Anr. that, an employee had a right under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India to claim interest on delayed payment of retirement benefits. Leave encashment is also a retirement benefit, which is granted to an employee in lieu of service rendered. All retirement benefits are paid in recognition of the sincere and long drawn service rendered by an employee to the employer. It is neither a charity nor gratis granted by an employer.

In Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, the Apex Court held that, in spite of delay in filing an application for grant of interest on gratuity and order retirement benefits, the delay would not be fatal and shall not take away the claim of the Petitioner in getting interest on delayed payment.

The Respondents are directed to pay 6% interest on the gratuity as also the leave encashment benefits. Such payment shall be made under separate heads for gratuity and leave encashment, payable from the next day of the date of superannuation up to the date of payment. Writ petition is disposed of.

Tags : GRATUITY   INTEREST   ENTITLEMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved